A Bronx Tale

Beowulf Boritt’s scenery can be as large a character as anything in a show.  Take the phenomenal cityscape from Act One (the play from Moss Hart’s memoir) that rotated from tenement to luxury penthouse and back again.  It was an awesome framing device to an exceptional play.  We are treated to big moving brownstones in A Bronx Tale, but this time they get in the way.  Perhaps they were going for choreography but the structures’ spinning, then moving upstage and back throughout the proceedings is distracting, overwhelming this rather underwhelming musical.

Based on his one man show turned into a well-admired 1993 movie, Chazz Palminteri wrote the book with Alan Menken (every Disney musical and the great Little Shop of Horrors) providing the music.  We are in the Bronx alternating between the years 1960 and 1968 in an Italian neighborhood ruled by “goodfellas.”  Young Calogero is a child seduced by the easy money earned from the mob.  The older Calogero is our narrator and lead character in the story who is looking back on choices made, while trying to find the right path for his future (Bobby Conte Thornton, confident portrayal in his Broadway debut).

At far too many curtain calls these days, the audience leaps to its feet like puppies begging for Snausages.  Tellingly, that did not happen at the end of A Bronx Tale although the audience seemed more satisfied with the show than me.  There’s one outstanding song, “One of the Great Ones” sung by our mob-in-chief played by the always solid Nick Cordero (best thing in Bullets Over Broadway, great off-Broadway work in Nice Girl and Brooklynite).  All of the other songs are unmemorable.  Supporting players with little to do are given goombah names (Frankie Coffeecake, JoJo the Whale) but there is no character development whatsoever.  The direction is credited to Broadway veteran Jerry Zaks and Robert De Niro (who also directed the movie, his first).  If telling your cast to stand center stage in the spotlight and sing facing forward is direction, then WOW.  But the set moves a lot so I guess someone had to coordinate that.  The absolute worse thing in A Bronx Tale was the Sound Design.  The cast was amplified like it was playing an arena.  When the material is this subpar, loudness does not help.  I’ve certainly seen worse but this one’s not good.  Terrible may be too strong.  But maybe not.

www.abronxtalethemusical.com

Groundhog Day

Once in a while you go to a Broadway show and leave so completely entertained that you can hardly believe your luck.  If you don’t already know, the basic plot premise is that Phil Connors (Andy Karl) is an irritable, obnoxious weatherman sent to Punxsutawney, Pennsylvania to cover Phil, the groundhog, and his shadow prediction for spring.  But something happens and he wakes up to face February 2nd again and again.  I vaguely remember liking the movie on which this show is based and I am a big fan of Andy Karl’s previous work (On the Twentieth Century, Rocky, The Mystery of Edwin Drood, Legally Blonde).  His performance (acting, singing, clowning, being an asshole) is astonishingly great and he is onstage nearly the whole show.

I would rather not give too many details, just go.  Groundhog Day is a combination of inventive set design (Rob Howell), a very funny book (Danny Rubin), clever lyrics (Matilda‘s Tim Minchin, another winner) and direction (Matthew Warchus) that tightly packs in so much hilarity throughout.  Importantly, this entire cast was stellar and memorable no matter what the size of the role.  If you want to attend a big Broadway show, be wildly entertained and leave completely in awe of the talent that created and performs this finely tuned machine, then Groundhog Day is a must-see.

www.groundhogdaymusical.com

The Little Foxes

The Little Foxes first opened on Broadway in 1939 with Tallulah Bankhead as Regina Hubbard Giddens, the woman at the center of this story which takes place in a small Alabama town in 1900.  The play is a rich feast of family dysfunction and greed set in the south when times and fortunes had changed after the Civil War.  Other actresses who played this juicy role on Broadway included Anne Bancroft, Elizabeth Taylor and Stockard Channing.  Bette Davis did the movie.  I had never seen the play or the film until now.

This Manhattan Theater Club production stars Laura Linney and Cynthia Nixon who alternate the role of strong-willed Regina with her fragile sister-in-law Birdie in different performances.  I saw Ms. Linney as Regina and Ms. Nixon as Birdie in their Tony Award nominated roles.

The Little Foxes deserves its status as a classic.  The good versus bad morality tale is a bit obvious but who cares when the actors have such interesting characters to play, fantastic confrontations and, especially in the case of Birdie, heart-breaking self-revelations.  My Cynthia Nixon theater experiences have been mixed in the past:  Rabbit Hole (enjoyed) and Wit (not so much).  Ms. Nixon was simply awesome here, fully disappearing into the character of Birdie with every big moment perfectly realized.  She won the Tony against an extremely strong group of nominees from Sweat and A Doll’s House, Part 2.    Having seen them all now, it’s hard to argue.

Regina’s husband, Horace Giddens, was played by Richard Thomas, also Tony nominated.  At the start of the play, Horace is sick and away from the family.  When he returns in Act II, Mr. Thomas plays a convincing head of household with a seriously troubling illness.  Regina’s brothers, played by Michael McKean and Darren Goldstein, were perfectly inky.  A very strong cast overall in a play that is a period piece but still has a lot to say about how people are treated and how greed drives our culture and relationships.  Still topical today.

I did not love Ms. Linney’s Regina but she was fine in the part.  I felt there needed to be more edge to this beast of a woman.  Plus, and this happens for me with some actors, you can see the acting and not the character.  That said, this play was a superb revival and a great opportunity to understand why Lillian Hellman’s work remains a classic of the theater.

littlefoxesbroadway.com

Bandstand

Bandstand is a new musical about United States servicemen returning home from World War II and attempting to settle down into normalcy again, “Just Like It Was Before.”  Naturally, this being a musical, our servicemen are accomplished musicians forming a band to win a nationwide songwriting contest.  An enjoyable, if flawed, first Act falls headfirst over a cliff in the second Act, the whole endeavor marred by fatal errors particularly in direction, sets, sound and lighting.

The premise here is a good one:  the integration of our soldiers back into society with all the baggage in their heads and the changes at home which make the journey a true struggle.  Adding to that premise are more than a handful of well-written songs from upbeat swing to heart-wrenching ballads.  Bandstand struggles a bit (like the recent Sunset Boulevard revival) with how much darkness the musical needs to nail the tension.  But I felt there was a solid backbone with which to build a memorable show here.

Laura Osnes (Julia) has a beautiful, clear voice.  I should not have to struggle to hear her over the band which happens.  The set in Act I never changes.  We are always in a bar/nightclub and the cast busily and distractingly moves tables, chairs, pianos, glasses and the like to effect scene changes.

Choreography is inserted whenever possible despite whether it makes any sense or advances the story.  In one scene, Julia and the band are performing and her mother (Beth Leavel, terrific) is on hand to watch.  I’m sitting center orchestra row G and I happen to look stage left and see the mother and the nightclub owner flirting.  I chalk that little throwaway moment to actors embellishing a scene.  Then the four couples dancing spread out wide across the stage.  Ms. Leavel has to move almost completely offstage to allow the dancers room.   They are not really doing anything important, we are just opening up a huge space center stage to be able to see Ms. Osnes and the band perform.  Eventually, the dancers return and Ms. Leavel slides back into full view.  A teensy tiny slice of the show to be sure, but a real example of choreography taking over the proceedings.  Perhaps directors and choreographers (Andy Blankenbuehler) should not be the same person?

Then we get to Act II.  Hard fall approaching.  We are leaving Ohio, going to New York.  No spoiler alert needed as there was no doubt the plot would take us there.  Miraculously, the entire set now moves offstage which annoys me since some scenic movement in Act I might have helped the storytelling.  What follows is a bizarre Art Deco train ride complete with four dancing porters.  We morphed stylistically from Guys & Dolls to On the Twentieth Century.  If you are going to go that far, why is the train just some basic chairs on a platform?  The show then gets bogged down to wrap up plot and minor characters are largely throwaway stereotypes.  Thankfully some good songs help us through.

Happily, the servicemen deliver the goods, lead by Corey Cott (Donny Novitski) who commands the stage and gives us a fully fleshed out anguished leading man.  His band mates were all good, adding shades to underwritten characters giving them life and individuality.  Did the band’s costumes pay homage to Jersey Boys at the end?  And why?

There’s a beautiful song “Welcome Home” at the end of the show.  How about lowering the lights and setting a mood?  Ms. Osnes can certainly sing and dance well, but her acting can come across as two-dimensional.  She’s given an amazing, richly written 11:00 song that she delivers big time.  It might have been nice to help her by framing the drama visually as well.  That is direction which was sorely missing here.

One more thing regarding that little throwaway flirtation mentioned earlier.   In the finale, the nightclub owner and Julia’s mother were, voila, a couple.  Seriously, the almost unnoticeable little mini-scene thrown offstage by choreography was needed to connect that dot at the end.  A hot mess.

bandstandbroadway.com

Six Degrees of Separation

In 1991, I saw the original Broadway production of Six Degrees of Separation with Stockard Channing and Courtney Vance.  At the time, it felt like a very important cultural moment play.  The acting was superb and the concept that we are all connected to everyone in the world through a chain of not more than six people became part of our vernacular.  How would the play hold up?  Do I need to revisit it?  I let the reviews sway me and I caught Six Degrees this week on the day it posted an early closing notice.  Too bad.  The play holds up extremely well; I had feared it might have dated itself by this point.

The play is based on a real life story of a con man and robber who claimed to be Sidney Poitier’s son.  The playwright, John Guare, had a friend who told him the personal encounter that later became the basis for this play.  Set in New York in the 1990, the privileged class is in full exposure.  The plot is quickly set in motion when a Harvard college friend of Ouisa and Flan’s children (Allison Janney and John Benjamin Hickey) drops by their apartment with minor stab wounds from an attempted mugging.  Paul (Corey Hawkins) happens to be in town because his father is producing a film version of Cats.  I had forgotten how much abuse is heaped on Cats in this play – and the fact that is again running on Broadway at the same time is perfect.

I enjoyed all of the leading performers and also the over-the-top spoiled brattiness of their children.  It should be mentioned that there are 18 characters in this play, adding depth and helping to define the world surrounding Ouisa, Flan and Paul.  A couple of choices made, such as the elongated nude scene, were not necessarily for the better.  However, the play is rich and complex.  We get further and further inside Ouisa’s mind as she comes to term with the events that have shaken their Kandinsky world.  I thoroughly enjoyed this revisit to a classic.

Sunset Boulevard

I saw the original production of Sunset Boulevard with Glenn Close as Norma Desmond back in 1995.  She won a Tony for the role and I remember thinking she did a fine job in a show I recall as being “just ok” with a couple of good songs and a really big set.  So I had no special interest in reliving the experience until the reviews for Ms. Close came out when the show opened in February.  The NY Times’ critic Ben Brantley’s highly dramatic “one of the great stage performances of this century” among other glowing reviews influenced my decision to go.

The verdict.  The show remains “just ok” for me.  Is it musical comedy or a darker musical noir?  Who can say for sure but they both don’t coexist successfully for me.  Glenn Close, on the other hand, completely killed.  Not only was the character fully realized – scary, tragic, fragile and driven – but she knocked each of her big songs clear out of the park.  I know Ms. Close couldn’t be nominated for a Tony in the same role again but she was clearly the best performance by an actress on Broadway this year.  (Admittedly, to be 100% certain, I have a couple of performances still to see… but the chances of a bad call here are nil.)

The main reasons to see this show is Ms. Close and the orchestra which lushly performed the gorgeous melodies contained in the score.  While I liked Fred Johanson as Max, I did not warm to either Michael Xavier (as screenwriter Joe Gillis) or Siobhan Dillon (Betty Schaeffer).  I wanted significantly more noir shades from Joe and a lot less standard issue ingénue in the part of Betty.  Perhaps lighting that made sense for this show might have helped them.  I will say that they sang “Too Much in Love to Care” beautifully though.

sunsetboulevardthemusical.com

 

 

 

Indecent

Indecent is the true story of a Yiddish play, God of Vengeance, which was written in 1907.  Following the play’s successes in Europe, it is translated into English, opens on Broadway in 1923 where the entire cast is arrested for indecency.  At the core, a lesbian relationship.  Dreamlike staging and imagery only add to the thought provoking frankness of the characters’ Jewish heritage at that particular moment when both immigration restrictions and anti-Semitism prevailed.  I loved how the story proceeded along, with pieces of the original play interspersed with the history of the actors and the musical interludes which firmly establish a mood and a people.  The payoff by the end is both glorious and riveting.  The cast is uniformly excellent, especially Katrina Lenk and Adina Verson as the ladies at the center of the controversy.  Go see this.  It speaks to the importance of theater and history in helping us shape the direction of the world we want to live in.

indecentbroadway.com

Hello, Dolly!

I saw Hello, Dolly! on May 31st and purchased my ticket last October when the Bette Midler as Dolly Levi frenzy was in full bloom.  As a result, my seats were fantastic (and very expensive).  Further, I am happy to report that the show is fun.  If you go to see Hello, Dolly! primarily to watch Bette ham it up and hoof it around the stage while playing Dolly for laughs, laughs, laughs, then you will be smiling while basking in the audience lovefest for every second Ms. Midler is on the stage.  If, like me, you were looking for a great revival of Hello, Dolly! with the character of Dolly Levi fully explored with all her humor plus her vulnerability and pathos, then you’re likely to be a tad disappointed, despite the grand proceedings.  Sadly, Ms. Midler’s singing voice was not quite up to the task at hand either.

Surrounding Ms. Midler are a slew of excellent performances notably by David Hyde Pierce as Horace Vandergelder, Gavin Creel as Cornelius Hackl and Kate Baldwin as Irene Malloy.  Having seen a number of Ms. Baldwin’s recent stage appearances, this one was my favorite.  As usual, her voice is outstanding but I loved her character which felt truly different (and spot on) than the other types she has played.  A big thank you to Taylor Trensch (Barnaby Tucker) and Beanie Feldstein (Minnie Fay), who were hilarious and memorable in their roles.  The only real miss was the normally funny Jennifer Simard as Ernestina, in an odd characterization that did not work for me.

It’s Hello, Dolly!  The waiters dance!  We get to put on our Sunday clothes!  We watch Bette descend the staircase!  We have a great time!  If only this Hello, Dolly! was a truly great revival.  Oh well.  Perhaps we dream next of Annaleigh Ashford as Fanny Brice in Funny Girl…..

hellodollyonbroadway.com

War Paint

War Paint tells the fascinating stories of Helena Rubenstein and Elizabeth Arden, two women who created and ruled the cosmetics industry for much of the 20th Century.  They were the only women of their time to have companies named after them.  A great history with big characters require grand performers and we are in luck.  Both Patti Lupone (Rubenstein) and Christine Ebersole (Arden) deliver.  Yay!

The reviews I read before seeing this show were fairly mixed about the show even if they loved the stars.  And, yes, Ms. Ebersole has the best song with “Pink.”  From my seat, I saw a show that was beautiful to look at, a story that was very interesting with intensely executed performances by the leading ladies.  The show is essentially two separate stories bound together by their commonality of time, industry, gender and success.  A solid score and book whose only (but not insignificant) flaw was the one dimensional male characters in their lives.  I guess we need to let the ladies go off stage for a moment or two, but the relatively brief filler time was well below par.

Overall, I thoroughly enjoyed War Paint.  If you are looking for big performances and a set design that effortlessly draws you into the world of these cosmetic titans, then run to see “War Paint.”  You will then be rewarded by the costumes which are fabulous throughout.  A parade of fashions and styles from the 1930s to the 1960s.  And those hats !  It’s always a pleasure to sit through a show, understand what the creative team was attempting to do and be rewarded with a truly enjoyable night of theater.

warpaintmusical.com

A Doll’s House, Part 2

I still have never seen A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen.  I am vaguely aware of the general story and its famously shocking ending when first produced in 1879.  Therefore, in a crowded spring season for Broadway, Part 2 was not near the top of my must-see list.  Then I noticed the playwright was Lucas Hnath.  In 2015, “The Christians” (Playwrights Horizon) was one of my favorite plays that year.  Later that same season, I saw “Red Speedo” at New York Theater Workshop in a visually arresting production.  I loved them both for their thought-provoking characters and storylines so I took the plunge.

Along with her co-stars, Jayne Houdyshell, Chris Cooper and Condola Rashad, Laurie Metcalf leads us through this quasi-sequel as Nora.  While the play is definitely a Part 2 to A Doll’s House, it arrives over a century later.  The dialogue is often hilarious as the play ingeniously weaves us through a series of moral complexities.  Every character is rich, three dimensional and fully embodied in these wonderful performances.

Even more importantly, the play’s plot flows effortlessly and believably.  The director, Sam Gold, has effectively realized the combination of classic with contemporary.  All of the actors spar against each other and themselves on a minimalistic perfect set.  The audience is rewarded by revisiting a classic and its characters but with the freshness and spin enabled by crisp, modern dialogue plus the analytical passage of time.  Is marriage a good or bad thing?A Doll’s House, Part 2 firmly puts the spotlight on that debate.  And this playwright lets us decide, if that’s even possible.

Leaving the theater, I overheard two older men griping about this production.  They complained that the direction was all wrong and took the easy road by playing for laughs rather than being serious.  Ibsen this is not.  It’s Hnath and it’s genius.  Wherever he goes next, I’m all in.

dollshousepart2