The Wild Parrots of Campbell (NOW Collective)

In Sean Gorski’s excellent scenic design, an inflatable parrot is perched on the back of a lounge chair.  More parrots hang from the eave of the house.  One of them, tellingly, has deflated and collapsed onto the gutter’s downspout.  Three empty beer bottles and two empty Proseccos sit on the table.  An accumulation of cigarette butts fills the ashtray.  Even the table cover has images of parrots.  It’s New Year’s Eve and time to meet The Wild Parrots of Campbell.

Amanda is the newest resident of this unkempt California home.  She brings a camera outside to take photos of the squawking birds which reside on telephone wires nearby.  Charlie invited her to live with him after having developed a six month relationship with her online poker playing persona, stubborn-girl-96.  Amanda’s early take on her new situation is candid.  The house contains “dirty dishes and a bunch of losers who don’t want me to be here.”

Change seems difficult for these slackers.   Nikki is the front woman of a feminist punk band.  She notices the inside getting cleaner.  “She’s leaving her mark.”  Jack understands that his brother’s “always brought in strays.”  Charlie has been grieving since his mother died.  He fills his inherited home with humans adrift in financial predicaments and unfocused, yet swirling, seas.

Charlie is unhappy but his online relationship with Amanda helped him cope.  She has had her own troubles and his offer was a chance to escape.  She’s 20 years old and he is 23.  The face-to-face encounter isn’t exactly going as planned for either of them.  She’s quiet and off-putting.  He’s tired of “all the slacker shit” but surrounds himself with that world.  The tense energy created by this home intrusion is utterly believable in Alex Riad’s world premiere play.

Older brother, the freeloading Jack, is 31 and sits around all day drinking.  Jobs suck and not doing them is his rule.  He returned to his childhood home last year after a thirteen year absence.  Charlie had to take care of his dying mother alone.  The bridge between them is vast but a familial sense of responsibility helps their relationship maintain a reasonable co-existence.

Kevin is the fifth person living here.  He works at Psycho Donuts (Crazy Good!) with teenage girls.  He spends his free time getting stoned as “a day is an easy thing to waste.”  Kevin is portrayed by Adrian Burke.  The character is two-dimensional and the performance is equally two-dimensional.  This loser without feelings or depth is so completely realized you knowingly agree when Charlie says that he has the “social skills of a radish.”  When Kevin is finally needed to step up and say something meaningful other than “cool,” the moment was sadly pitiful and vividly realized.

Padraic Lillis directed The Wild Parrots of Campbell and his cast develops all of their naturalistic characters into fully fleshed out, damaged souls.  There are (many) slacker laughs to be had.  Mr. Riad’s play, however, seems more invested in the past traumas endured by these people which caused their symbiotic co-dependence.  How did each of them get here?  More importantly, will any of them get better in this house together?

Nikki admits hers is “a pretty pathetic life to keep fighting for.”  I left the theater believing she may have the best shot at a different future.  Charlie may be the one with the job at Google but his anxieties seem too deeply rooted.  Both appear to manage the outside world more easily than the others – or at least pretend better.  Both Kasey Lee Huizinga and John Dimino beautifully inhabit these roles with stark realism and abject fear lurking very near the surface.  Their second act scene together exudes a bond of friendship that only years of history can create.

Older brother Jack is filled with warmth, drunkenness, compassion and anger.  Why did he not return home until his mother died?  Evan Hall is tremendously successful in bringing all facets of this complicated person in a strikingly complete portrait.  Jack has a compellingly dramatic scene near the end of the first act.  This was the only section of this play where the writing seemed a bit heavy-handed.

Domenica Feraud nicely handles the difficult role of Amanda.  She may be the most adrift despite her no smoking or drinking stance.  In a houseful of young people surviving emotional injuries, she has not put on as many Band-Aids as the others.  When asked “will you ever go home?” she replies “I hope not.”  The gaping wounds and crusty scars are what make this play so very penetrating.

The parrots are indeed real in Alex Riad’s observational and searching character study.  They squawk and even say a few phrases.  They remind us that words are heard and remembered sometimes long after they’ve been said.  An entertaining piece of theater that managed to get under my skin, The Wild Parrots of Campbell is definitely a trip to the zoo to see slackers.  By the end, you’ll hope the souls in these particular cages will find peace, love and joy.  I’m doubtful and eternally hopeful.

The Wild Parrots of Campbell is playing at the Cherry Lane Studio Theatre in Greenwich Village until December 21, 2019.

www.nowcollective.org

www.cherrylanetheatre.org

A Christmas Carol in Harlem (The Classical Theatre of Harlem)

A close friend recently told me there was no cure for climate change.  Too many people are on the planet.  He theorized the solution was to eliminate two-thirds of the world’s population.  Ebenezer Scrooge also shares the same sentiment.  If the sick and downtrodden cannot survive then they will help “decrease the surplus population.”  A Christmas Carol in Harlem updates Charles Dickens’ classic novella into modern times with a socially contemplative spin.

Charles Bernard Murray is a miserable Scrooge and that is a compliment.  He is a landlord who boasts “tis the season to pay rent.”  A social worker Sierra Jones (Ure Egbuho) pleads with him to not raise rents so high that people are forced out of their homes.  “There’s welfare for that,” Scrooge replies.  “Many are not faring well,” she counters.  The rallying cry is bluntly delivered.  “Harlem, are you tired of the increasing number of empty store fronts?”  This story is localized and laser beam focused on its neighborhood.

Scrooge is a classic miser.  For him, Christmas is about wasting money from online sales to throw away trees.  He tells Ms. Jones that he always follows the law when charging tenants.  Her well-written response: “laws by design make fairness elusive.”  Many topical points are raised in this story to bring themes from the Victorian era into present day Harlem.

The structure of Dickens’ story is followed from the Cratchit family’s financial woes to the ghost visitations.  Eryn Barnes acrobatically performs the Ghost of Christmas Past.  Her enjoyable take on the role is limber, casually stylish and unique.  This section of A Christmas Carol in Harlem is a high point.  Scrooge revisits his old workplace, a packing and shipping facility.  A rousing ensemble number singing “underneath the mistletoe” is fun.  This is one of many moments that Alan C. Edwards’ lighting design is used to excellent effect.

The staging of this musical is filled with visual treats from costumes (Lex Liang and Margaret Goldrainer) to varied entrances and exits.  The set design (Izmir Ickbal) is a clever set of boxes with window cutouts to represent city buildings.  They will shuffle around as the story requires and also hold props.  The projections (Maxwell Bowman) nicely enhance the simple settings.  The playground fence with a hole in it was wholly recognizable.

Director Carl Cofield and Choreographer Tiffany Rea-Fisher have inserted interesting transitions using their ensemble to represent the hustle and bustle of a city.  The scene change between the office and the clock store was especially good and led to a very funny cameo by Angela Polite as the Clock Shop Lady.

Not every moment in this show is at that same level.  The more serious sections slow momentum until the next bit of sparkle arrives.  This musical is clearly a family entertainment.  Playwright Shawn René Graham has written this version to be locally focused and easily relatable to its target audience.  A few social concern points, however, come across as messages delivered by standing on a soapbox rather than through organic dialogue.

What is particularly rewarding about this take on the parsimonious Scrooge are the bigger picture lessons which this theater company is passionate about communicating.  Harlem used to be a cultural mecca as exemplified by the past glories of the Lenox Lounge and the Savoy.  There is an urgent plea to make arts thrive again in this community to enrich the neighborhood and, by extension, reflect its people and their lives.

The overarching theme of A Christmas Carol in Harlem is to keep the holiday spirit alive throughout the year.  Worldwide problems like climate change and income inequality can seem daunting and unsolvable.  This musical beautifully presents an alternative to giving up.  Every person can make a difference.  Start by taking care of one child at a time followed by one family.  Incremental steps will lead to taking care of one building at a time and then one block at a time.  That is the recommended prescription to bringing joy back to a neighborhood.  Isn’t that the true meaning of Christmas?

A Christmas Carol in Harlem is playing through December 21, 2019 in Aaron Davis Hall at City College.

www.cthnyc.org

The Santa Closet (Houses on the Moon Theater)

Christmas is fully represented on the stage in the small Teatro Círculo Theater.  All is not quite normal though.  On the left side of the stage there is a decorated tree with presents underneath.  The same thing is duplicated on the right side except this group hangs upside down from the ceiling.  Our world and the legend of Kris Kringle are turned upside down in The Santa Closet.  Claire DeLiso’s scenic design beautifully prepares the viewer for this topsy-turvy tale.

Written and performed by Jeffrey Solomon, The Santa Closet is an update of a 2009 Off-Broadway play.  Santa Claus is Coming Out has been rewritten to reflect changes in our society since then.  Every word, he promises, is based on real interviews with individuals and creatures.  Mr. Solomon plays all of the parts.  This story is thought-provoking and funny.  The struggles are realistic and theatrical.  Could Santa be gay?

Young Gary writes a letter to Santa.  He wants a Sparkle Ann Doll.  Action figures are boring since “you can’t style their hair.”  Mom tells us that her son is “more sensitive… artistic.”  Dad always has to play the bad guy to protect him from bullying.  The parents are standard issue types but are compassionately rendered to reflect inner turmoils and fears for their son.

Sidney is Santa’s Jewish agent.  He’s the one who got Santa those Coca-Cola commercials all those years ago.  He narrates part of this story.  Sid is one of a parade of broad stereotypes.  Gary’s best friend is a young black girl.  The elf foreman is a manly blue collar guy.  There is an Italian man and a harsh family values woman who hates the “radical alphabet people.”  Mr. Solomon easily slips in and out of all of these characters as the tale unfolds.

When Gary fails to receive his beloved Sparkle Ann Doll, the next year he is extra good.  “I cut all the plastic rings on Daddy’s beer cans so the sea turtles do not get choked.”  His new Christmas request is Dream Date Norm, a shirtless, muscular Ken-like plastic doll.  Fans of mockumentary films will find much of the tone here familiar and welcome.  The play is agreeably silly with dashes of wink-wink snarkiness tossed in.

Rudolph makes an appearance.  He is a founding member of the Misfit Task Force.  The name was changed to the Christmas-Town Diversity Committee because Hermie the Dentist thought the word “misfit” could be offensive.  One child writes to Santa and asks, “Why do gay people say, you better work it?”  When the jokes land, they are often hilarious and good-spirited. Many laugh lines fall a little flat, unfortunately.

The best parts of The Santa Closet involve more serious philosophical questions.  Santa was caught in a photograph as a participant in the Stonewall riots.  Agent Sid has to hire an actress to play Mrs. Claus for damage control.  (Her “nuances have nuances.”)  The plot morphs into a consideration of the legend of Santa Claus and what would happen if it were discovered he was a gay man.

There is a good deal of crisis imagined in Mr. Solomon’s play.  None of it seems far-fetched, sadly.  How would parents react?  The media?  Children?  Focusing a rainbow spotlight on the cherished Father Christmas makes for some thoughtful debate.  Since the show presents this material in a fairly tame manner, families could watch this together and have interesting discussions afterward.  The Santa Closet was inspired by the need to discuss LGBTQ issues with children.  On that level, it succeeds.

The play is directed by Joe Brancato and Emily Joy Weiner.  Mr. Solomon is a game performer who brings these characters to life.  (My favorite was Gary’s mother with the Italian a close runner-up.)  The video projections are very well done.  The Santa Closet has good intentions but the story does drag on as characters frequently rotate in and out of the story.  Jokes miss as much as they hit.  The concept is terrific, however.  This modern parable might be even better realized as a mockumentary film with multiple actors creating a campy and insightful holiday treat.

The Santa Closet is running at Teatro Círculo until December 22, 2019.

www.housesonthemoon.org

Unmaking Toulouse-Lautrec

One of the best known painters of the Post-Impressionist period, Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec lived a short and fascinating life.  His art captured the spirit of late 19th century Paris from the denizens of brothels to the dancers at the Moulin Rouge.  Bated Breath Theatre Company in conjuction with the bar Madame X are presenting an immersive entertainment entitled Unmaking Toulouse-Lautrec.

This one hour show is billed as immersive theater.  When heading up the stairs to the upper floor of this bar, the door opens and you enter a room dripping in red.  Head over to the bar and grab a cocktail.  There are an assortment of chairs and couches on the perimeter of the elongated room.  The environment is very promising.

The “show” is an assortment of sketches and imagery intended to illuminate a feeling of the era.  The action occurs on a balcony at one end and also in the middle of the room.  Highlights from the painter’s life are covered from his bone growth disorder to his troubled relationship with his parents.  They were first cousins.  Was inbreeding the cause of his physical ailments?  There is nothing that deep considered in this production but Toulouse-Lautrec’s feelings of inferiority register strongly.  What happens after his childhood makes sense from the biographical outline presented here.

The underclass of Paris did, however, embrace him to a degree.  They became the inspiration for his extensive artistic output.  In order to celebrate this era, dancers will perform the can-can.  Sexy women are clad in bustiers.  The mood is light and fun but the artist is anything but that.  He descends into alcoholism and catches syphilis.  There are many bad syphilis jokes told.

This revue-like show contains some truly inspired moments such as when his mother (Derya Celikkol) uses movement and a marionette to narrate her relationship with her son.  As Toulouse-Lautrec, Daniel George was very effective.  The overall impact is, unfortunately, only a slight diversion.  The concept is interesting but the execution is just a bit too simple, especially when compared to other immersive theatrical events in New York.

Ticket prices are a reasonable $47 and include a complimentary cocktail.  The show is performed twice on Wednesday nights and is usually sold out.  Unmaking Toulouse-Lautrec has some good creative elements.  The audience is very small and everyone is close to the action.  In order to make this a recommended trip downtown, this company should probably further develop the Parisian vibe of the period.  As it currently stands, this endeavor does not have enough focus to even sustain its one hour running time.

Unmaking Toulouse-Lautrec began performances six months ago and is currently booking through January 8, 2020.

www.unmakinglautrecplay.com

The Black History Museum… According to the United States of America (HERE)

“I’m old enough to remember Jim Crow.  It may have been waning but it had a heartbeat.  So during Obama it was hard to see it coming back.”  A 2019 descendant from slavery begins and ends the journey through The Black History Museum… According to the United States of America.  This immersive and interactive piece honors “the lives of ancestors stolen from Africa” on the 400th anniversary of American slavery.

Conceived and directed by Zoey Martinson from Smoke & Mirrors Collaborative, this museum tour is an expansive review of and commentary on black history through the use of powerful words, expressive dance, biting satire and historical objects.  Visitors will tour through rooms and hallways of HERE’s entire downtown space.  What makes this material even more compelling and fresh are the questions it directly and indirectly asks.  None more powerful than “what would you say when you found out you were not human?”

After a farcical reenactment of some of the Founding Fathers codifying white privilege into the constitution, the historical tour commences.  A hallway with portholes leads the viewer into a wooden pen.  The joy of freedom is celebrated through dance and video (choreography by Francesca Harper).  The horrors of captivity then flood the screens and change the dancers forever.  The Founding  Fathers are observant and silent.  This beginning is powerful, uncomfortable and very effective.

A recording is played as the audience gathers in the lobby before the performance begins.  “What is black?” is the question asked to multiple individuals.  The replies are thoughtful and personal observations.  Combining a broad outline of black history with insightful details enriches the storytelling from history lesson to emotional interpersonal journey.  Everyone in the room regardless of race faces this truth in their own way.  The piece can seem angry, exhausting, goofy, heartbreaking, heartwarming and cleverly stylized.  Ambitious and a little unfocused at times, there is a ton of intellectual stimulation to absorb.

The surprises continue as you walk through this museum.  People were visibly straining through two hours of standing.  That discomfort is surely intentional.  I believe the middle section where there is time to wander through some exhibits should probably be shortened.  Breathable air in the basement space was less than desirable.

The charms contained in this section, however, enlighten and enrage.  A shrine to Bayard Rustin, the civil rights leader who was posthumously awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by Barack Obama.  Written communication between people such as a father’s 1914 letter to his daughter.  The recurring themes of individuality and connectivity to ancestral bonds is harshly projected against the overt racism of the questionably believable American Dream.

A poster from a Darryl Zanuck film Pinky! caught my attention.  The tagline was “…She passed for white!”  The second most popular movie of 1949, it was nominated for three acting Oscars including one for Ethel Waters.  Marshall, a city in Texas, banned the film.  The depiction of a white man retaining his love for a woman after he knew she was Negro was too much to bear.  In a segregated theater where blacks watched movies from the balcony, the owner showed the film and was fined.  Joseph Burstyn, Inc. vs. Wilson became the landmark free speech case whereby the Supreme Court gave movies first amendment protection.

Finding these gems of history (and researching their import afterwards) adds a museum-like authenticity to the performed scenes of dark humor and guttural outrage.  I jotted down a note when I saw sheet music for a Bert Williams’ song entitled, “The Phrenologist’s Coon,” written in 1901.  Here’s a sample lyric: “Now by us scientists ’tis often said/If a coon has an egg-shaped head/Means chickens he will steal.”  Another well chosen artifact to help illuminate the countless and deliberate debasements of a race of people in a country whose formation is a legacy of genocide.

The Black History Museum, like many works of art, requires its audience to put some of themselves into the piece.  This production is meant to be experienced.  In my head, I heard my relatives.  When a black woman would be performing on television when I was a child, they sometimes referred to her singing as “coon shouting.”  That memory came flooding back.  Like all worthwhile pursuits, it takes effort to make up one’s own mind between right and wrong when indoctrinated with the often misguided teachings of parents, governments and religious organizations.

Near the end of this play, there is a short section which asks the question, “Did You Know?”  Significant and hardly known accomplishments of black citizens throughout American history are recounted.  The point being made is critical and on target.  How much black history is being taught in schools and in history books told through the lens of the white perspective?

The problems continue today.  The permanent prison class which has been created “to legalize slavery” grows and grows with the overt support of both Republican and Democratic Presidents since the Civil Rights Act.  Ms. Martinson, along with her co-writers Kareem M. Lucas, Jonathan Braylock and Robert King, can hit hard and it stings.

So many people were horrified by the confederate marches in Charlottesville.  The movement has definitely been reignited with the election of Donald Trump.  The Supreme Court is rolling back voting rights.  Dark skinned immigrants are the current target but who knows who’s next on the list of the righteous.  Imagine being a child born here on a family tree containing centuries of slavery.  Imagine her seeing white men carrying flags and torches which can only mean a desire to return to that period.

The Black History Museum makes you listen to a black perspective.  The scope is overwhelming and intimate at the same time.  If you plan to attend this slightly uneven and ultimately rewarding piece of theater, wear very comfortable shoes.  Dress with the knowledge that the rooms can be very warm (coat check is provided).  So many thoughts went through my head during and afterward.  That’s the sign of a successful trip to a museum.

The Black History Museum is presented by HERE and Smoke & Mirrors Collaborative through November 24, 2019.

www.here.org

www.smokemirrors.org

BrandoCapote (The Tank)

Truman Capote interviewed Marlon Brando in 1957.  The legendary actor was in Japan filming Sayonara.  Hilariously, we overhear one of the movie’s sales pitches.  They are using “real Japanese actors.”  This conversation is one level of the multi-media piece BrandoCapote.  On the flip side, this dance play is a commentary on men and toxic masculinity.

Scenes from Mr. Brando’s films are cleverly projected onto fans and umbrellas.  As the interview took place in Japan, the Noh style of theater is casually referenced here.  The actors wear kimonos.  Movie scenes such as a violent outburst from A Streetcar Named Desire are repeated.  A voice-over makes the excuse that “he worked hard for us” followed by “it was just a different time.”

Snippets from unforgettable movies such as On the Waterfront, Julius Caesar and The Godfather are interspersed with repetitive movements.  Meanwhile, Mr. Brando claims that he is not an actor.  He is a mimic.  The line drawn on stage is the connection between father and son.  The violence is passed down through mimicry.

In BrandoCapote, that overt mimicry is an integral part of this dance.  Brando’s son Christian murdered his sister’s boyfriend in 1990.  She hung herself five years later at the age of 25.  This piece aggressively compares the violence society accepts (or even celebrates) in popular entertainment to the collateral damage it causes in real life.

Occasionally the phrases “let me start over” and “let me get this right” are heard.  What is on the stage, however, suggests that this inherent violence is an unbroken circle.  Juxtaposing the effeminate Truman Capote against this backdrop paints a vivid picture of the vast spectrum of manhood.

Is BrandoCapote a play?  Yes, in some respects.  Brando is asked, “are you religious?”  His reply: “I don’t believe in imaginary friends.”  The movie scenes are carefully chosen to set the mood.  The dance suggests many things including violence, repetition and cleaning sequences.  Abstract is the name for this world.

Sara and Reid Farrington conceived this expressive and specific piece.  She was the writer and he directed.  There is a vast quantity of creativity on display in this seventy minute amalgam of performance art and oddly awkward yet nostalgic glimpse of men.  Brando was THE actor of his generation.  Lines are boldly drawn to the issues still being faced today by abusive men.

The performers play various family members but that’s a loose concept.  Using Noh theater as a guide, both humor and horror make appearances.  The technical projections are frequent and nicely varied.  The choreography by Laura K Nicoll is precise and rhythmic.  There are many pauses when you hear the tape or film reels rewind.  These glitches become movements by the cast which are impressively timed and jolt us from one segment to the next.

BrandoCapote is ambitious, non-linear, memorable and wholly original.  It also is a play, a dance and a historical  multimedia exhibit.  The entire production feels long as the messages and imagery are often repeated.  Patience is advised.  Not all of the segments connected in my mind such as the rearranging furniture.  However, the sheer mass of creativity and research in the creation of this work is commendable.  A most unique dissection of the American male psyche.

BrandoCapote is running at The Tank through November 24, 2019.

www.thetanknyc.org

The Hope Hypothesis (Voyage Theater)

Is playwright Cat Miller in possession of an oversized blender?  For her play The Hope Hypothesis, she tosses in Alice in Wonderland, a Kafkaesque tale, absurdist comedy, a spy thriller, soap opera histrionics and a deep state government mystery all together.  She turns the dial to frappe because that’s the most fun setting.  Out pours a surprisingly refreshing and very delicious treat which successfully manages to be equally dark and light.

There were two inspirations for this story.  A New York Times article chronicling comprehensive bureaucracy in the Islamic State.  The second was the experience of a friend who was almost deported despite being married to an American.  Amena is the Alice of this play.  Down into the rabbit hole of America’s immigration system she will fall.  Whether or not she finds a Mad Hatter is debatable but the Mock Turtle and Tweedledum certainly make an appearance.

Amena (Soraya Broukhim) arrives at an American government facility.  She approaches a Teller.  He asks for her identification, including a birth certificate.  She doesn’t have one.  He, therefore, is unable to help her.  Get one and come back another day.  She then, oddly, pulls out a birth certificate.  The ISIS country flag shocks the Teller.  Amena has aroused suspicion and badly fumbles her explanation.  The Teller pushes the panic button.  Whoosh, down the hole she goes.

Amena is confronted by two FBI agents.  The lead questioner (William Ragsdale) has little regard for due process.  The other is a dolt (Greg Brostrom).  Amena’s emotionally fragile boyfriend Brendan (Charlie O’Rourke, excellent) comes searching for her.  The Teller and his supervisor (Connor Carew) are also questioned.  The pot is stirred.  Paranoia is stoked.  The climate is fear and uncertainty.  The plot evolves cleverly and convincingly, always making sure to have time for amusing asides.

The Teller doesn’t appreciate the term “H.R.”  He doesn’t like to be thought of as a “resource.”    His 22.5 months in this job is going to be his stepping stone to the Presidency of the American Federation of Government Employees.  An underachieving nincompoop, he thrives by throwing others under the bus.  “You forfeit due process when you align yourself with an enemy agent,” he proclaims.  Wesley Zurick is slinky and hilarious playing this delusional nobody.

Laughter is in abundance in this production.  Ms. Miller has directed her own play.  The care and attention to setting the right tone is critical for success.  Her characters have to play the absurdity straight as an arrow in order to deliver memorable throwaway lines like “there was a problem with pills.”  That one comes out of nowhere and elicits a huge guffaw.

The actors effectively embrace their caricatures but each of them leave the necessary room for realism.  That allows for a healthy balance between comedic trifle and sly commentary on America’s current climate.  Scenes which unravel throughout this play can be ridiculously melodramatic like a silly soap opera.  The intermingling of characters and locations provide ample opportunities for escalating lunacy.

Like a good thriller, however, things frequently turn quite serious as well.  When a person loses hope, they either destroy themselves or others.  Or both.  That is the hypothesis of the title.  Ms. Miller’s use of sarcasm could not be a more perfect fit for our times.  We are in the land of quid pro quo and border wall cages.  Facts are just opinions.  A little levity to shake us free of the oppressive feeling of hopelessness is most welcome.

The action is set in three rooms of a governmental facility.  An exceptional set design by Zoë Hurwitz beautifully transitions between teller window to interview room to employee break room.  The scene changes are fast and creatively executed.

Will Amena successfully navigate the dark forest that is the U.S. immigration system and find her escape back to normalcy?  When Carol (Mary E. Hodges) arrives to this particular tea party, the rule of law seems to guide next steps.  This is Trump’s America, however.  The land where skin color defines good versus evil.  Truth and hope are in short supply.  What’s the best part of this play?  A good beginning, a great middle and a satisfying conclusion.

The Hope Hypothesis manages to take a current, very serious topic and turn it on its head for laughs. Audaciously commingling styles is what makes this production stand out.  I left the theater impressed and happy.  Then I turned on the news.  Oh well, at least there was some hope (and considerable entertainment) to briefly distract me from the world at large.

The Hope Hypothesis is presented by the Voyage Theater Company and will be performed at the Sheen Center through November 15, 2019.

www.sheencenter.org

www.voyagetheatercompany.org

All Hallow’s Eve

Halloween can take many forms when packaged for entertainment.  There’s the Elvira-type with its campy clowning (“grab your tools, boys, and let’s start banging”).  A spooky funhouse usually contains a few thrills and chills.  Jumpy people like myself steer clear.  Slasher films aim to terrify.  This holiday can effectively play to many styles.  All Hallow’s Eve deliciously bills itself as “a wild, eclectic horror musical with puppets.”

This quasi-immersive theater piece takes the audience through a series of rooms.  The first stop is outside a home which has been seriously decked out for trick or treaters.  Mom (Marca Leigh) is dressed as a witch and she is fully stoked for an excellent day.  Preparations are nearing completion.  Ominously named daughter Eve (Haley Jenkins) is testing the moving ghosts attached to the clothesline.  She’s wearing the classic sheet with eye holes and dryly remarks about being a Ralph Lauren ghost.

Dad goes along with the program but is really focused on scoring Mars candy bars.  Eve has a twin brother Evan (Spencer Lott).  While mom clings to her traditions, the kids just want to get candy and toilet paper some houses.  Mom quickly relents and their adventure begins.  The twins sing a song which comments on this nostalgic opening.  “Necco wafers, what are those?”

After an awkward transition into the next area, the puppet show begins in earnest.  The kids start their papering project.  On a small stage, a chorus of cute, silly and clever puppets come alive.  They are manipulated by an ensemble completely covered in black.  You know they are there but the effect allows for Kaitee Yaeko Tredway’s wacky choreography.  Evan sees a button that says “press.”  Uh oh.

Follow me says the mistress of the house.  She is simply named Witch (Jennifer Barnhart).  Her persona is a little Elvira and a lot of Ru Paul’s Drag Race. She has the culinary yearnings of Dr. Frank-n-Furter with her assortment of puppet co-conspirators.  The kids may be in trouble.  What danger lurks while a storm rages?  The kind showcased by a Witch who fake plays a skeleton as the band accompanies her on a vibraphone.

This musical then veers in many directions from silly to macabre, never quite reaching its spine-tingling ambitions.  The best section, by far, is an inspired show-within-a-show.  The Witch plays her marionettes from high above.  They dance and tell jokes.  Her sidekick PumpkinMan (Tyler Bunch) offers enthusiastic and dim-witted support.  I laughed.

The puppets are impressive and so is the talent that created this show.  Martin P. Robinson wrote and directed All Hallow’s Eve.  He is the man who built, designed and performed Audrey II in the original Little Shop of Horrors.  Best known for his thirty years or work on Sesame Street, he performed Telly Monster, Mr. Snuffleupagus and others.  Mr. Robinson was also the animatronic puppeteer for the character of Leonardo in Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.  It’s not a surprise, therefore, that these puppets are very inventive and interestingly manipulated.  A number of transformations are outstanding.

Musical Director Paul Rudolph composed the score for this musical.  I detected a whiff of Rocky Horror in at least one song.  The story wanders from jokey to menacing and back again.  The laughs are generally not big enough.  Will the kids ever escape this Witch and her band of evildoers?  No real tension is created which undermines the spookier parts.  The puppet variations, however, always draw your eye into the visuals (even as your brain checks out on the plot).

Immersive theater is thriving in New York.  All Hallow’s Eve isn’t quite ready for the big show yet.  The puppets are truly a treat. The trick to making this creative endeavor soar are even funnier jokes, better tunes, sharper edges, a further developed plot and, most importantly, better management of the audience.  A minor Halloween diversion today.  Let’s hope this matures into a nostalgic and eerie must-see tomorrow.

All Hallow’s Eve is running through November 2, 2019 at the Connelly Theater.

www.allhallowsevemusical.com

You Took a Part of Me (Armitage Gone! Dance)

In June, I had the opportunity to see four short works from a week long festival of contemporary choreographers called Women/Create!  One of the pieces was a short selection from You Took a Part of Me by Karole Armitage.  The full version is being performed this week at New York Live Arts.  This dance is both visually and intellectually interesting as it embraces the world of Japanese Noh theater.

Originating in the 14th century and still being performed today, Noh is often based on traditional literature.  You Took a Part of Me references the 15th century play Nonomiya.  This work was derived from an 11th century story by Murasaki Shikibu.  She wrote of The Tale of Genji, considered to be the world’s first novel.  In this particular segment, the ghost of one of Prince Genji’s lovers returns to the world of the living.

In order to present this dance, Ms. Armitage uses a stage which is evocative of traditional Noh theater.  The stage is square with a narrow bridge.  Thin strips of light illuminate the stage border.  Above, rather than a typical wooden roof structure, another series of lights suggest a ceiling.  The symbolic reverence for the sanctity of this type of theater is respected and sets a melancholy, pensive and analytical mood.

Mugen Noh is a play which features a ghost or spirit.  Time is often depicted as non-linear.  Action can pass between two or more time frames from moment to moment, including flashbacks.  In the original story, the ghost of Lady Rokujō indulges herself in her memory of parting from Genji at Nonomiya shrine.  She dances gracefully and sadly.

The elegant Megumi Eda portrays the Ghost who begins the performance attached to her Double (Sierra French) by interconnecting hair.  Movement is slow and deliberate.  They eventually separate.  The Ghost is then reconnected to her Lover (Cristian Laverde-Koenig).  A series of serious and playful connectivity follow.  At one moment, she comfortably rests on his back.

Later, the Double arrives and dances with the Lover while the Ghost sits, quietly thoughtful.  Is she obsessing on her sadness?  Her jealousy?  Her gaze may signify a searching memory from the afterlife.  I felt her weighing life’s regrets in an obsessively psychological study of the suffering contained in her soul.

The hallmarks of Noh drama are erotic entanglements, unresolved attachments and a search for harmony.  Ms. Armitage’s choreography evokes all of these elements in precise, slow moving connections and disconnections between the dancers.  A minimalistic and very effective score by composer Reiko Yamada punctuates the movements but still provides ample quiet reflection.

A Koken (Alonso Guzman) is a stage attendant in Noh theater who typically dresses in black and functions only to assist the performers.  Everything feels very calculated yet the storytelling is decidedly shadowy.  Has her spirit come to terms with her memories?  Three of us saw this piece (two of whom were Broadway dancers) and we enjoyed proffering our opinions afterward.

Megumi Eda, Sierra French and Cristian Laverde-Koenig are all wonderful dancers to watch.  The development of character, especially through their facial expressions and eyes, greatly enhances the somberly reflective atmosphere created.  This dance is measured in its pacing.  A meditation for a woman revisiting love’s complications with all of its tangles and knots.

Karole Armitage decided to name her piece after a Bob Dylan song.  Two lines beautifully sum up the feelings expressed through this dance.  “Maybe in the next life I’ll be able to hear myself think.”  A Noh sentiment for sure.  And perhaps this summation is most instructive: “I try to get closer but I’m still a million miles from you.”

You Took a Part of Me is being performed at New York Live Arts through October 26, 2019.

www.newyorklivearts.org

theaterreviewsfrommyseat/womencreate

Victor (Axis Theatre)

A gorgeously haunting ghost story is summoned up in the memoir Victor by Edgar Oliver.  The ghosts are many.  A man named Victor.  The way of life for marginalized New Yorkers from decades past.  Memories of people loved and lost.  Regrets and joys in abundant proportions.

Mr. Oliver is a member of Axis Theatre and has worked with Director Randy Sharp before in the company’s productions and his previous solo pieces.  There is a relaxed, mysterious and lyrical easiness to this performance which is beautifully realized in the always atmospheric environs in Axis’ Greenwich Village space.

A friendship story both intimate and flamboyant, these two men first crossed paths when Victor was 39 and Edgar was 28.  Their lives joined together around an East 10th street rooming house.  During the last sixteen years he lived there, Mr. Oliver was the only resident.  Fascinating observations witnessed of the denizens of the lower east side are recalled.  They provide a glimpse back to a world of a seedier (and perhaps more romantically interesting) period in our city’s colorful history.

Edgar considered Victor a “real man.”  He loved women but was, what they might say today, gay friendly.  Edgar worshiped this bald, barrel chested, muscular man with his huge biceps.  Victor reminded him of the cartoon character Popeye.  Two cans of Popeye brand spinach, a present from Victor, are still in Edgar’s possession.

Victor loved movies and vodka.  They enjoyed watching them together.  They’d often drink or smoke pot on the stoop.  This melancholy remembrance is filled with detailed imagery, both softly reflective and vividly prismatic.  As an actor, Mr. Oliver is a riveting presence.  He floats around the stage with an ethereal fairy-like grace.  His words are poetic and punctuated with reminiscences both pensively reflective and revealingly personal.

Mr. Oliver is eulogizing a friend who spent many years as a homeless man.  Why didn’t he stay with Victor one day until the film From Here To Eternity ended?  He asks a lot of questions of himself and enriches his tale with a view only achievable in one’s later stages in life.  Edgar remembers Victor, the man he obviously idolized, fondly.  He wonders what he’s meant to the various men he loved through the years.

A effectively simple set by Chad Yarborough contains black boxes in different heights suggesting an ominous and vague city outline.  David Zeffren’s lighting design bathes Mr. Oliver in a moody glow which references the black and white movies Victor and Edgar loved to talk about.  Paul Carbonara composed the perfect amount of melodious original music for three musicians which nicely elevates this unique memoir.

At the end of this show, linger in the lobby for a few minutes to view the memorabilia collected by Mr. Oliver.  There are many writings Victor would drop in his mailbox through the years.  The Popeye cans of spinach are on display.  Is this a summation and consideration of regret in a life lived marginally on the outskirts of mainstream society?  Or is this a life brimming with creative expression?  An alternative approach to existence, survival and the search for connection, love and meaning?

Victor is a wonderful theatrical experience no matter which interpretation captures your fancy.  Artists who lived during this period are and will be continuing to decline in number.  Catch Edgar Oliver’s imaginative retelling.  Feel the spirit of a soon-to-be forgotten slice of New York history which attracted and accommodated all sorts of quirky, colorful and memorable citizens.

Victor is being performed at the Axis Theatre Company through October 26, 2019.

www.axiscompany.org