The Young Man From Atlanta (Signature Theatre)

As an enormous fan of the work by Horton Foote, I was genuinely thrilled that Signature Theatre was going to revive The Young Man From Atlanta.  I missed that production when it had its world premiere in 1995.  Mr. Foote was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for this play.  I find that praise hard to fathom after sitting through this stilted melodrama.

Will Kidder, Lily Dale Kidder and Pete Davenport are the major characters in this play.  They were included in the magnificent nine play opus called the The Orphan’s Home Cycle.  I saw a superb revival of the entire cycle at Signature Theatre in 2009.

The original story was about generations of a family inspired by Mr. Foote’s own father.  He decided to revisit these characters when he wrote The Young Man From Atlanta.  The settings are typical of his style combining quirky Texas families and their relationships with each other and the outside world.

Will Kidder (Aidan Quinn) is much older here and has suffered the loss of his only child who drowned at 37 years old.  He’s convinced the death was suicide.  He discusses this with a co-worker as he cannot talk to his wife.  Clunky set-ups like this one at the start of this play mar the usual believable and naturalistic atmosphere so prevalent in other pieces.

Wife Lily is sure the drowning was an accident.  Her grief has stopped her from playing the piano.  She reminded me of my grandmother who never drove a car after her teenage son died.  That pain is recognizable.  Kristen Nielsen, an admirable and often excellent comic actress, is necessarily restrained in her performance.  She is not necessarily the right choice for this part, however.

The title character is a man who lived with their son in Atlanta.  He showed up at the funeral and was obviously grieving.  Lily is still communicating with him and has sent him money.  When the patriarch loses his job, the solid ground of the white American male collapses.  Mr. Foote’s men see work ethic as their primary driver in life.  An absolute right to success that they are owed given their efforts.  With the debt of a brand new home, money is suddenly tight for the first time ever.  Financial stress mounts and it is not hard to predict what will happen.

The Kidder’s have a black maid named Clara (Harriet D. Foy).  Lily is obsessed with “The Disappointment Club.”  This is one in which black women supposedly fail to show up for work at white women’s homes to get back at them.  Lily’s heard that Eleanor Roosevelt was behind this and quizzes both black characters about their knowledge of such club.  Texas in the 1950’s feels segregated as in the book and film, The Help.

Throughout the performance I caught, lines were flubbed repeatedly.  Some people come across as underdeveloped caricatures.  Others such as Lily’s stepfather (Stephen Payne) just blandly appear and seem to add little to the proceedings.  Michael Wilson directed this production as he did with the accomplished Orphan’s Home Cycle.  I cannot pinpoint why the tone seems so off-kilter and the pacing so labored.  A late scene between Will and Lily, thankfully, was richly emotional and perhaps hinted at the original’s success.

Pat Bowie portrays Etta Doris in the show’s best scene.  She is a retired elderly maid who worked for Lily many years ago.  Clara invited her to say hello.  There is a touching moment when the passage of time and the wisdom of age is considered.  Whose life is happier or more settled in retrospect?

Dan Bittner and John Orsini were equally memorable as the co-worker Tom Jackson and a familial relative named Carson.  We never meet the young man from Atlanta.  It is not too hard to guess why this grieving man is clinging to Lily’s sympathy.  Their creative son was always a bit different and hard to understand.  Set in 1950, one can understand the burying of secrets.  By 1995, however, this contrived soap opera is hardly unique storytelling or thematically revolutionary.

I highly recommend trying Horton Foote’s plays.  They are usually superb dissections of a time, a place and a people he knows intimately.  The Young Man From Atlanta is not one of them.  The cycle mentioned above as well as The Trip to Bountiful, Dividing the Estate and The Roads to Home are all ones I’ve seen and worth your time.  I will seek others out as they are revived.  He’s usually that good.

The Wild Parrots of Campbell (NOW Collective)

In Sean Gorski’s excellent scenic design, an inflatable parrot is perched on the back of a lounge chair.  More parrots hang from the eave of the house.  One of them, tellingly, has deflated and collapsed onto the gutter’s downspout.  Three empty beer bottles and two empty Proseccos sit on the table.  An accumulation of cigarette butts fills the ashtray.  Even the table cover has images of parrots.  It’s New Year’s Eve and time to meet The Wild Parrots of Campbell.

Amanda is the newest resident of this unkempt California home.  She brings a camera outside to take photos of the squawking birds which reside on telephone wires nearby.  Charlie invited her to live with him after having developed a six month relationship with her online poker playing persona, stubborn-girl-96.  Amanda’s early take on her new situation is candid.  The house contains “dirty dishes and a bunch of losers who don’t want me to be here.”

Change seems difficult for these slackers.   Nikki is the front woman of a feminist punk band.  She notices the inside getting cleaner.  “She’s leaving her mark.”  Jack understands that his brother’s “always brought in strays.”  Charlie has been grieving since his mother died.  He fills his inherited home with humans adrift in financial predicaments and unfocused, yet swirling, seas.

Charlie is unhappy but his online relationship with Amanda helped him cope.  She has had her own troubles and his offer was a chance to escape.  She’s 20 years old and he is 23.  The face-to-face encounter isn’t exactly going as planned for either of them.  She’s quiet and off-putting.  He’s tired of “all the slacker shit” but surrounds himself with that world.  The tense energy created by this home intrusion is utterly believable in Alex Riad’s world premiere play.

Older brother, the freeloading Jack, is 31 and sits around all day drinking.  Jobs suck and not doing them is his rule.  He returned to his childhood home last year after a thirteen year absence.  Charlie had to take care of his dying mother alone.  The bridge between them is vast but a familial sense of responsibility helps their relationship maintain a reasonable co-existence.

Kevin is the fifth person living here.  He works at Psycho Donuts (Crazy Good!) with teenage girls.  He spends his free time getting stoned as “a day is an easy thing to waste.”  Kevin is portrayed by Adrian Burke.  The character is two-dimensional and the performance is equally two-dimensional.  This loser without feelings or depth is so completely realized you knowingly agree when Charlie says that he has the “social skills of a radish.”  When Kevin is finally needed to step up and say something meaningful other than “cool,” the moment was sadly pitiful and vividly realized.

Padraic Lillis directed The Wild Parrots of Campbell and his cast develops all of their naturalistic characters into fully fleshed out, damaged souls.  There are (many) slacker laughs to be had.  Mr. Riad’s play, however, seems more invested in the past traumas endured by these people which caused their symbiotic co-dependence.  How did each of them get here?  More importantly, will any of them get better in this house together?

Nikki admits hers is “a pretty pathetic life to keep fighting for.”  I left the theater believing she may have the best shot at a different future.  Charlie may be the one with the job at Google but his anxieties seem too deeply rooted.  Both appear to manage the outside world more easily than the others – or at least pretend better.  Both Kasey Lee Huizinga and John Dimino beautifully inhabit these roles with stark realism and abject fear lurking very near the surface.  Their second act scene together exudes a bond of friendship that only years of history can create.

Older brother Jack is filled with warmth, drunkenness, compassion and anger.  Why did he not return home until his mother died?  Evan Hall is tremendously successful in bringing all facets of this complicated person in a strikingly complete portrait.  Jack has a compellingly dramatic scene near the end of the first act.  This was the only section of this play where the writing seemed a bit heavy-handed.

Domenica Feraud nicely handles the difficult role of Amanda.  She may be the most adrift despite her no smoking or drinking stance.  In a houseful of young people surviving emotional injuries, she has not put on as many Band-Aids as the others.  When asked “will you ever go home?” she replies “I hope not.”  The gaping wounds and crusty scars are what make this play so very penetrating.

The parrots are indeed real in Alex Riad’s observational and searching character study.  They squawk and even say a few phrases.  They remind us that words are heard and remembered sometimes long after they’ve been said.  An entertaining piece of theater that managed to get under my skin, The Wild Parrots of Campbell is definitely a trip to the zoo to see slackers.  By the end, you’ll hope the souls in these particular cages will find peace, love and joy.  I’m doubtful and eternally hopeful.

The Wild Parrots of Campbell is playing at the Cherry Lane Studio Theatre in Greenwich Village until December 21, 2019.

www.nowcollective.org

www.cherrylanetheatre.org

The Santa Closet (Houses on the Moon Theater)

Christmas is fully represented on the stage in the small Teatro Círculo Theater.  All is not quite normal though.  On the left side of the stage there is a decorated tree with presents underneath.  The same thing is duplicated on the right side except this group hangs upside down from the ceiling.  Our world and the legend of Kris Kringle are turned upside down in The Santa Closet.  Claire DeLiso’s scenic design beautifully prepares the viewer for this topsy-turvy tale.

Written and performed by Jeffrey Solomon, The Santa Closet is an update of a 2009 Off-Broadway play.  Santa Claus is Coming Out has been rewritten to reflect changes in our society since then.  Every word, he promises, is based on real interviews with individuals and creatures.  Mr. Solomon plays all of the parts.  This story is thought-provoking and funny.  The struggles are realistic and theatrical.  Could Santa be gay?

Young Gary writes a letter to Santa.  He wants a Sparkle Ann Doll.  Action figures are boring since “you can’t style their hair.”  Mom tells us that her son is “more sensitive… artistic.”  Dad always has to play the bad guy to protect him from bullying.  The parents are standard issue types but are compassionately rendered to reflect inner turmoils and fears for their son.

Sidney is Santa’s Jewish agent.  He’s the one who got Santa those Coca-Cola commercials all those years ago.  He narrates part of this story.  Sid is one of a parade of broad stereotypes.  Gary’s best friend is a young black girl.  The elf foreman is a manly blue collar guy.  There is an Italian man and a harsh family values woman who hates the “radical alphabet people.”  Mr. Solomon easily slips in and out of all of these characters as the tale unfolds.

When Gary fails to receive his beloved Sparkle Ann Doll, the next year he is extra good.  “I cut all the plastic rings on Daddy’s beer cans so the sea turtles do not get choked.”  His new Christmas request is Dream Date Norm, a shirtless, muscular Ken-like plastic doll.  Fans of mockumentary films will find much of the tone here familiar and welcome.  The play is agreeably silly with dashes of wink-wink snarkiness tossed in.

Rudolph makes an appearance.  He is a founding member of the Misfit Task Force.  The name was changed to the Christmas-Town Diversity Committee because Hermie the Dentist thought the word “misfit” could be offensive.  One child writes to Santa and asks, “Why do gay people say, you better work it?”  When the jokes land, they are often hilarious and good-spirited. Many laugh lines fall a little flat, unfortunately.

The best parts of The Santa Closet involve more serious philosophical questions.  Santa was caught in a photograph as a participant in the Stonewall riots.  Agent Sid has to hire an actress to play Mrs. Claus for damage control.  (Her “nuances have nuances.”)  The plot morphs into a consideration of the legend of Santa Claus and what would happen if it were discovered he was a gay man.

There is a good deal of crisis imagined in Mr. Solomon’s play.  None of it seems far-fetched, sadly.  How would parents react?  The media?  Children?  Focusing a rainbow spotlight on the cherished Father Christmas makes for some thoughtful debate.  Since the show presents this material in a fairly tame manner, families could watch this together and have interesting discussions afterward.  The Santa Closet was inspired by the need to discuss LGBTQ issues with children.  On that level, it succeeds.

The play is directed by Joe Brancato and Emily Joy Weiner.  Mr. Solomon is a game performer who brings these characters to life.  (My favorite was Gary’s mother with the Italian a close runner-up.)  The video projections are very well done.  The Santa Closet has good intentions but the story does drag on as characters frequently rotate in and out of the story.  Jokes miss as much as they hit.  The concept is terrific, however.  This modern parable might be even better realized as a mockumentary film with multiple actors creating a campy and insightful holiday treat.

The Santa Closet is running at Teatro Círculo until December 22, 2019.

www.housesonthemoon.org

Staging the Daffy Dame (Notre Dame, IN)

Lope de Vega was a prolific Spanish playwright during Spain’s Golden Age.  He was a contemporary of Shakespeare and nearly five hundred plays are attributed to him.  One is La dama boba written in 1613.  This play has been loosely translated as The Lady Simpleton or The Lady-Fool or Lady Nitwit.  Staging the Daffy Dame is a modern consideration of how to present this work in the #hashtag era.

The original play is not simply the silly exploits of a daffy woman or two.  The main characters seem to fall under the spell of potential suitors.  Their father is strict.  Is that to protect or control them?  In a world dominated by men, what role do these women play in order to adapt themselves to their time?  Can daffy be an intelligent strategy to manipulate the world to their advantage?

That is a premise worthy of study.  Staging the Daffy Dame has been written by faculty member Anne García-Romero and was presented by the Notre Dame Film, Television and Theatre Department.  The idea is great but the plot has been grossly overstuffed with nearly every possible hot topic of the moment.

Lupe Sanchez (Natalia Cuevas) is a college professor.  Her vision is to stage The Daffy Dame with colorblind casting.  Latino and Latina actors covet these roles.  Why should they have to share them?  After an overextended sequence about calling them Latinx now, there is an interesting but unanswered question.  Shouldn’t Latinx actors train on Spanish classics like English actors train on Shakespeare?

This story about putting on a play falls into the trap of soap opera plotting.  Twists and turns are not really established.  Felicia Alvarado (Ana Wolfermann) will be playing the lead opposite Luis Gonzalez (Jake Berney).   In the third scene, she announces that she cannot act with him.  I couldn’t see how that was established.  When he suggests they try to rehearse in the play’s native Spanish, she says, “I’m experiencing a hostile environment.”

Felicia, it turns out, is an undocumented immigrant and does not speak Spanish.  Both leads are in the midst of the DACA cycle.  He outs her to the cast.  The director is criticized for creating a hostile environment where such behavior could happen.  The term “safe space” is tossed into the mix.  A cast member who suggests rehearsing in the play’s native language is treated as horrific and insulting.  If this is what the intellectual give and take of college campuses are now, I’m very glad to be well past this period in my life.

As you might imagine, there are lots of side dramas and relationships.  Susan Harrison is “attracted to smart, woke, interesting men or women depending on the person.”  In the best, most complete performance, James Cullinane plays the jock type.  While the character of Jeff Hollister has to utter “bro” and “dude” more times than a frathouse on Friday night, he manages to fill out the role and shade it nicely into a fully developed real person.  He even manages to make the “homoerotic friendship” rehearsal scene work with Mr. Berney.

The best scene in this production, by far, is the one between the jock and the bisexual young lady.  Mr. Cullinane and Ms. Barron brought nice depth and interpersonal chemistry to the moment.  The playwright added some nice imagery about birds crashing into windows, leading to conversations about one’s soul and healing.

The professors and the stage crew are fairly underdeveloped stereotypes.  One stagehand is gay, the other wants to remain a virgin.  Being a professor of the arts as a person of color is hard.  “Don’t pull that card with me,” screams the other teacher.  I found the mounting cliches too much to bear.

When the play finally gets to the point where the cast is Staging the Daffy Dame, I was engaged.  The costumes (Richard E. Donnelly) were particularly good.  Director Kevin Dreyer did not amp up the antics far enough to demonstrate that this was corral de comedias typical of the period.  After all of the woke lecturing and many mini-dramas, an over-the-top flamboyant style might have made all the previous plodding worthwhile.

University theater departments should be pushing their students to take on culturally relevant topics.  They also should be exploring the classics and bringing lesser know plays and playwrights into the theatrical discussion.  The attempt to combine the two ideas was commendable.  The result, however, seemed more like a teaching exercise rather than an explosion of intellectual debate about women and immigrants in today’s society.

www.performingarts.nd.edu

The Underlying Chris (Second Stage Theater)

There are playwrights who create new works that I feel compelled to see because their previous efforts has been so good and original.  Will Eno is one of them.  I’ve already encountered Thom Pain (based on nothing), Middletown, The Realistic Joneses and Wakey, WakeyThe Underlying Chris is a terrific addition to that recommended list.

Mr. Eno seems to be an acquired taste.  Critics and audiences are not all on board.  I find his sense of humor to be the perfect kind of sarcastic observation.  Here is a line from this new play.  It shows up randomly and means nothing other than to elicit a laugh.  “We all know HOW aromatic candles are made but do we know WHY?”

The Underlying Chris is a play about a person who travels from birth to death.  In the first scene, a baby is in a crib.  The gender is not quite established.  (Oh no, is this going to be that sort of play?  Not to worry.)  Its mother is going to die in a car accident shortly.  This play is about the “moment that shapes a life and the people who shape a moment.”

Chris will age from a teenager to an old person in an assisted living facility.  “I’m dying of cake,” he states.  In an astonishing series of vignettes, all of the Chris incarnations will appear to show an unremarkable – and yet remarkable – life.  In one such segment, a young woman switches her sport of choice from diving to tennis.  Earth shattering?  No.  Real life?  Yes.

Throughout this play, Chris changes gender and race in each and every scene.  Names will vary such as Khris, Christine and Krista.  The clever conceit is clearly meant to show that our stories of life are universal.  This play takes the occasionally successful idea of colorblind and gender fluid casting and expands it to the writing itself.  Another layer of interest to enjoy.

Under Kenny Leon’s direction, the uniformly excellent (and beautifully modulated) cast flows through life’s largely familiar events.  The body is “a non-stop surprise party.”  As the underlying Chris ages, however, feelings seem to deepen as wisdom emerges.  An appreciation for the gift that is life emerges.  Chris realizes it is “quite an honor to be born.”  This is a tiny little play about slices of life that are as big as the concept of human existence.  Fantastic would be the adjective I would use to describe its impact when the final scene ends.

Unfortunately the play is being performed in the Off-Broadway house of Second Stage.  Regular readers might remember the obstructed view seating at Linda Vista earlier this season.  Unbelievably this theater company has done it again!  In the opening scene – and others – people sitting near me could not see the actors on stage.  How can one theater company with multiple stages and directors not notice this?

The scenic design by Arnulfo Maldonado was clever as the time periods flew by.  Side panels were not wide enough to consider everyone’s seat in the audience.  Scenes would roll off stage to the left and right.  While the actors on stage were performing, the noise level backstage was horrendous.  My notes included the words crashing and banging.  If you go to see this excellent play, sit farther back.  Maybe you won’t notice the blatant distractions.

Those avoidable missteps did not hinder my ability to love this play.  There is something inherently wonderful about pausing and considering the miracle of life.  Mr. Eno writes:  “Be glad you have a body.  Be glad you were there when the universe was handing them out.”  To that I would add:  Be glad, theatergoers, that you are alive while Will Eno is writing.

The Underlying Chris is running at Second Stage’s Tony Kiser Theater until December 15, 2019.

www.2st.com

theaterreviewsfrommyseat/lindavista

History of Violence (St. Ann’s Warehouse)

On Christmas Eve in 2012, Édouard Louis was raped and almost murdered in his apartment in Paris.  Four years later, a bestselling novel was published based on that traumatic event.  Along with Thomas Ostermeier and Florian Borchmeyer, History of Violence has been adapted for the stage in a riveting and multi-layered production.

A young man is sitting on a chair in what appears to be a waiting area.  The room is sterile in appearance.  In the large St. Ann’s Warehouse space, the set’s backdrop is enormously high.  People in hazmat suits come in and start to lift fingerprints off the floor.  A camera and microphone capture their efforts.  These sights and sounds are projected on the screen and through the superb sound design.  Evidence identification markers are placed around a crime scene.  What has happened?

Édouard reported the attempted homicide several hours after the incident occurred.  In the early morning hours of December 25th, he jumps in the shower.  He aggressively scrubs away the smell of Reda.  On his way home the evening before, the two men met walking down the street.  Reda cruised and charmed his way into an invitation.  The men had sex before things turned extremely dark.

At the start of this play Édouard was sitting on a chair because he went to the hospital for an antiviral prophylaxis treatment.  The grimness of the events are effectively rendered.  The tale is made bearable, and often very funny, by the mechanics of the storytelling and the clear-eyed, inventive and unique staging.

The courtship at the beginning of this horrific one night stand is flirtatious and cute.  Reda comes across as irresistibly sexy.  Renato Schuch is exceptional in the role.  The transformation to a terrifying demon is deeply layered with guilt, shame and self-preservation.

Édouard escapes Paris for a few days to visit his sister in the small town where he grew up.  He is another gay man who fled to the big city rather than fight small mindedness and stifling oppression.  His sister is played by the excellent Alina Stiegler.  She listens to her brother sympathetically and quite critically.  She repeats the story to her husband (Christoph Gawenda) while Édouard overhears them.

The family dynamic, the innate turmoils of homosexuals and societal repressions swirl gently and meaningfully as this tale unfolds.  Racism enters the storm as well.  Reda is an Algerian man.  The police believe he must be a miscreant and a criminal.

An unusually forthright memoir is brought to life through the bookish Édouard himself.  Laurenz Laufenberg impressively captures and demonstrates his naivete, his desire for love, his retreat, his shame and his ultimate survival.  The recollections are intense and uncomfortable.  The pendulum swings frequently and remarkably effortlessly between joyful (dance breaks!) and horrifying (rape).  Both extremes keep the edges sharp and surprising.

History of Violence is a presentation from the Schaubühne am Lehniner Platz (Theatre on Lehniner Square) in Berlin.  Artistic Director Thomas Ostermeier directed this outstanding production which is performed in German with English supertitles.  This is contemporary theater enriched by extraordinary storytelling and an unflinching examination of the human condition.  Be warned.  This show sails through some rough waters.

This company travels the world showcasing its voluminous work.  They have produced one hundred world and German premieres in the past nineteen years.  I will not miss an opportunity to experience again this level of quality and originality.

History of Violence is playing at St. Ann’s Warehouse until December 1, 2019.

www.stannswarehouse.org

www.schaubuehne.de

The Inheritance

Matthew Lopez has written the two part epic The Inheritance with inspiration from E. M. Forster’s Howard’s End.  That novel addressed social conventions, codes of conduct and relationships in England at the start of the 20th Century.  This play has updated the action to New York City from 2015 to 2018.  The story being told is about gay men.  The ambition of the writing is staggering.

Fascinatingly, Mr. Forster is a character at the start of this drama.  He advises a group that they can use his novel to loosely create their own story and even change the words.  This young generation of gay men are fairly critical of him.  He wrote Maurice in 1913 about a homosexual relationship.  That work was not published until after his death in 1971.  The obvious comparison being made is how much more accepting the world is today.  The other view is simply cowardice.

Are things truly better?  What social conventions have changed?  Which still oppress?  Eric Glass and Toby Darling are engaged to be married.  Toby is writing a play called “Lover Boy.”  Eric has befriended an older gay man who lives in their apartment building.  Walter Poole has been with his billionaire Republican partner for eons.  In a significant nod to Howard’s End, the name Henry Wilcox is used for the wealthy man.  These two older men also own a country house which similarly plays a central thematic role as in the novel.

The Inheritance is so boldly conceived that it has attempted a broad update of the 1991 masterwork Angels in America to the present day.  Tony Kushner’s play memorably covered the AIDS crisis in the latter stages of the 20th Century.  With treatments and preventive options now widely available (to at least those with the means), gay life and culture has moved on from the past.  The play celebrates much of that freedom wittily.  A sideline about whether camp should be over is winningly funny.

As you might expect, the young are not so free and not so happy as it might first appear.  Their gay baggage weighs them down and some much more than others.  The familiar and omnipresent family rejection lingers.  These are not new revelations.  Thoughts of finding one’s own family are a central theme of mainstream topical gay entertainments such as Ru Paul’s Drag Race.  Mr. Lopez’s play does, however, shine a bright light on the responsibility question and necessity of effective community building and support.

The direction by Steven Daldry on an impressively spare set (Bob Crowley) is energetic and fast paced.  The final scene at the end of the first half is mesmerizing theater and completely unforgettable.  The second part is nowhere near as tight as the first half.  There are many plot lines to wrap up and the strain is evident as the grinders of a soap opera finale churn.

At that point, a female character is introduced who is played by Lois Smith.  That scene is quiet and reflective which nicely guides this story to a satisfying conclusion.

The acting ensemble is stellar across the board.  Kyle Soller grounds this whole play in the central role of Eric who realizes that “to fall in love is to make an appointment with heartbreak.”  His solar energy sunbeam of a boyfriend, the brilliantly named Toby Darling, is played perfectly by Andrew Burnap.  The role is complicated, unsympathetic, joyously alive and emotionally moving at the same time.

John Benjamin Hickey commands all the gravitas needed to portray the conservative Wilcox.  Paul Hilton is memorable as the moral compass in the crucial dual role of Walter Poole and Morgan (E. M. Forster).  There are many Broadway debuts in this production and everyone succeeds at the highest level.  In the dual social climber roles of Adam and Leo, Samuel H. Levine was notably superb.

I elected to see The Inheritance on a single day with a dinner break.  That is a long commitment.  I highly recommend Part I.  Then take a few days off and let that half sink in.  There is a lot to process.  A little distance may also help Part II seem less clunky and heavy handed.  The scope of this production is immense.  Serious theater patrons should be impressed.  The gay community should be thrilled by the thoughtful discussions.  As Mr. Kushner advised years ago, “there is more great work to be done.”

www.theinheritanceplay.com

The Sound Inside

When I first saw David Cromer’s production of The Band’s Visit off-Broadway, I was enraptured by the quietly heartbreaking beauty of its story.  This musical transferred to Broadway and remained an intimate, very focused, purposefully unadorned show.  When you have outstanding material, letting it stand on its own can be a perfect strategy.  The Sound Inside is a great play by Adam Rapp.  Once again Mr. Cromer has mounted an exceptional production which thrills as it travels along a mysterious path.

Mary-Louise Parker portrays Bella, a creative writing professor at Yale.  She has written two short story collections and “an underappreciated novel.”  In her opening scene, Bella communicates directly to the audience.  She jots notes down on her pad as important details need to be written down.  Diagnosed with Stage 2 cancer and living alone, the story appears to be a bleak one.

The creative team’s design for this play never lets visual surroundings get in the way of the words.  Alexander Woodward’s Scenic Design and Heather Gilbert’s Lighting Design are completely in sync with the tone of the play as it has been staged.  Walking outside, there is a darkened hint of a tree which emerges in the background.  Bella’s office is cold and sparse.  Everything is grays and blacks.  Where will this two character play go?

Bella has a student in her freshman writing class.  Christopher is, without any doubt, an oddball.  He does not use Twitter and refuses to schedule his teacher meetings online.  Fighting against everything and everyone that is the Yale stereotype, is he an eighteen year old literary genius in the making?  Why so moody?  And so rude?

Christopher seems to respect Bella, however, and is presently writing his own novel despite his freshman course load.  The manuscript is obviously autobiographical fiction.  His protagonist is named Christopher.  He admits that the story is somewhat writing itself – or at least the characters are in charge.  Bella utters a single line which I wish I heard while struggling through creative fiction writing in college.  She tells him, “if your protagonist is leading you then you’ll likely stay ahead of your reader.”

The Sound Inside is a fascinating and complex tale in both storyline and structure.  Lovers of fiction and the process by which it is formed have much to savor in this ninety minute dialogue between two practitioners of the craft.  The balance between what is real and what is fictional on stage is where this play stays ahead of the listener.  Mr. Rapp has created a tightly wrought tale which seems, however, to meander very casually and organically.  The prose is often gorgeous.

I have long been a fan of Mary-Louise Parker and her impressive stage career.  Her major theatrical achievements include Prelude to a Kiss, Proof, Heisenberg and How I Learned to Drive.  Her performance in this play is flawless.  Will Hochman has the difficult task of keeping pace with her in a two character study.  He was excellent.

There is an important scene between the two where you start to wonder if a romantic angle may develop (the plot considers many different forks though the literary forest).  The lighting is warmer than the rest of the play.  The depth of the writing and these two actors pull you into this critical moment.  You are watching two people in a living room and the large Broadway house disappears.  Everyone who participated in this production made that magic happen.

The Sound Inside by Adam Rapp is unquestionably one of the best plays of this season.  The production is every bit as good as the writing.  This is Broadway at its absolute finest. Listen to the sound inside your head and do your best to see this before it closes.

The Sound Inside is running until January 12, 2020 at Studio 54.

www.soundinsidebroadway.com

Reparations (The Billie Holiday Theatre)

Every year from 1989 through his retirement in 2017, Congressman John Conyers Jr. unsuccessfully proposed a bill to study whether reparations should be paid for slavery.  In 2014, journalist Te-Nehisi Coates published an article, The Case for Reparations, renewing demands for compensation on a national stage.  On the 400th anniversary of slavery, James Sheldon’s new play Reparations is being presented at The Billie Holiday Theatre.

This company has been located in the heart of Brooklyn’s Bed-Stuy neighborhood for 47 years.  Its long history has enabled diverse voices to create storytelling for, by, about and near people of African descent.  This particular world premiere play is the first one they have produced by a writer of non-African descent.  “In 2019,” Artistic Director Dr. Indira Etwaroo notes, “theater remains a predominately racially segregated experience.”  Here, then, is an opportunity to “see one another anew” and “discover ways to ask new questions of one another and ourselves.”

Her program notes conclude with: “Isn’t that, after all, why we are here… breathing the same air, sharing the same space?  Even if only for a moment.”  This play has been given a mighty introduction for thought provoking discussion and timely consideration.  With this production, the mission has been accomplished.

The beautifully detailed Upper East Side apartment designed by Isabel and Moriah Curley-Clay announces restrained and tasteful elegance.  When the door opens, Ginny and Reg stumble in tipsy from a book launch party.  Ginny is a white woman who is older than her guest.  He is a black man who has been writing freelance travel pieces and has penned a new novel.  The beginning is awkward flirtation combined with somewhat forced cliches.

Ginny’s husband died seven months ago.  Her therapist recommends curing her grief by seeking out intimacy and integrating it into her old life.  Reg is clearly networking.  His book is about an African American police officer who is “Obama with a badge and a gun.”

Conversation between the two is flirtatious and stilted.  They came back to her apartment because she assumed he lived in a “fringey part of town.”  He accuses her of making a racist statement by assuming he lives in a poor neighborhood.  She knows what freelance writers earn.  The play meanders through social climbing rom-com with racial zingers and socioeconomic factoids.

Things get much more interesting when Ginny comments that “we all want to overcome the superficial differences that keep up trapped in our own silly little boxes.”  These include blacks, gays, transgender, Muslims and even white working class Americans.  Each is crying for help with their slogans “Black Lives Matter” and “Make America Great Again.”

In the second act, Ginny will prepare a paella for a dinner party.  Paella can be many different things and is often a combination of various meats, seafood and vegetables.  This play is the wordy embodiment of that dish.  Many disparate elements will be presented and consumed as “silly little boxes” are opened.  Ginny asks, “What happens when we confront realities outside our little boxes?”

There are numerous twists and turns in Reparations.  They dangerously teeter on the edge of soap opera revelations and stock situations.  Amazingly, however, the paella cooks long enough to bring a very satisfying dish to the table.  Reparations are more than a conceptual idea.  They have deep personal meaning and will be aggressively tackled before the play’s end.  Every character is a living breathing individual bringing their own experience and world views into a difficult debate.

Director Michele Shay has staged a high quality production for this intense and uncomfortable story.  Kamal Bolden is a mesmerizing Reg.  He is utterly charming, vengefully angry, cleverly calculating and, in my mind, a consummate survivor.  Alexandra Neil plays Ginny who embarks on her new life with trepidation and, in many respects, fearlessness.  Both share excellent chemistry.  Their early scenes nicely mask the fireworks which will follow.

Pompous Englishman and publisher Alistair (Gys de Villiers) and his wife, Nigerian born Millie (Lisa Arrindell, superb), will join Ginny and Reg for the luncheon party.  Both couples are of mixed races but their thoughts on reparations dig far deeper than the surface color of one’s skin.  The way the onion gets peeled open in this play may seem manipulative and it is certainly that.  However, the volume of stuff contained in all our little boxes – when thrust into the spotlight – allows us to test our humanity and our own character’s ability to rise up.

Reparations was an excellent addition to a fine month of theater.  I’ve been in a conservative Catholic box in Heroes of the Fourth Turning.  I spent time with LBJ as he attempted to forcefully open boxes wide with his civil rights agenda in The Great Society.  I walked through The Black History Museum and was, literally, put in a box.  In the epic The Inheritance opening this weekend, gay men come together to scream for their own escape.  Listening has never seemed more vital and important as we steer our country and its painfully confused moral compass to a better future.

www.thebillieholiday.org

theaterreviewsfrommyseat/heroesofthefourthturning

theaterreviewfrommyseat/thegreatsociety

theaterreviewsfrommyseat/theblackhistorymuseum

Dr. Ride’s American Beach House (Ars Nova)

Boredom sets in early and sits down for a long respite during the ninety minutes of Dr. Ride’s American Beach House.  Audience members noticeably squirm in their chairs.  A few leave, noisily.  This slice of semi-repressed lesbian Americana is underwhelming, cliched and an absolute waste of time.

Harriet and Mildred went to college together and studied poetry.  That has led them to careers as waitresses in St. Louis.  One is married with a child who is sick today.  Mom’s not really in a rush to get home.  The other has a boyfriend.  She describes in detail a sexual liaison she has with a motorcycle guy.  That story is so far from believable that it registers as amusingly ridiculous.

Both women hang on each other so casually that there is no doubt they are (or have been) lovers.  After a work shift, they gather on Harriet’s rooftop to gather for the Two Serious Ladies Book Club.  No books have been read.  Instead, they drink beer and listen to the radio.  They are excitedly anticipating the launching of the space shuttle Challenger the next morning.  Sally Ride is going to make history.

Dr. Ride was closeted as are these women.  It’s 1983 and a very different time.  This play is blunt with the metaphors.  These two close friends are in their thirties and life is eluding them.  Mildred has invited Meg to the book club.  She arrives wearing a Motorhead t-shirt and a backwards baseball cap.  Her hairstyle screams BUTCH!  She says, “I don’t hate men, they make me homicidal.”

Meg is the contrasting, very blunt counterpoint to these two women who are meandering through an unfocused life.  At one point, Meg changes the music to heavy metal.  She head bangs in her chair.  The other two eventually start jumping up and down in a dance of sorts.  The overtly obvious message is that these two lesbians yearn to be free like Meg.  Presumably metal is a gateway?  The scene is clumsy and cartoonish.

Another woman arrives to round out the lesbian stereotypes.  She only cares about “safety and money.”  Why is she in the house?  Who cares.  She has an unseen woman with her who never stops eating.  Yes, Liza Birkenmeier’s play is that cliched.

As Harriet, Matilda and Meg, Kristen Sieh, Erin Markey and Marga Gomez are committed to their dialogue and produce good characterizations.  Katie Brook’s direction dutifully stages the piece as written.  The audience drops in on a conversation with little backstory ever explained.  When snippets of information arrive, they seem forced.  I was bored from start to finish.

Why did Sally Ride want to go into space?  The funny theory offered was to “wave at the Russians” and “pray for you in your totalitarian darkness.”  I suppose the juxtaposition between Dr. Rice’s closeted existence and these women fumbling to thrive during this era is an interesting conceit.  I never got past the hoary stereotypes and general anesthesia of the evening.

Two women sat in front of us before this play began.  One turned around to apologize.  “I’m sorry, I’m top heavy… by that I mean tall.”  She was indeed tall but not blocking our view.  I assume the woman with her was her partner.  She replied “she’s top heavy the other way, too.”  The first responded, “Yes, I am.”  We all laughed heartily.  Neither of them seemed to respond enthusiastically when the show ended either.

www.arsnova.com