Franz Kafka’s Letter To My Father (M-34)

At some point during the outstanding live stream performance of Franz Kafka’s Letter To My Father, yet another reference began swirling in my mind.  Lyrics from an old song from the late 1970’s band Split Enz bizarrely came into focus.  “History never repeats / I tell myself before I go to sleep / There’s a light shining in the dark / Leading me on towards a change of heart, ah.”  Both that song and Kafka’s writing explore an anguished mental condition as a result of bitter relationships.

“Don’t say the words you might regret / I lost before, you know I can’t forget.”  Why did this song pull from the filing cabinet of memory?  Kafka’s gut wrenching analysis of his relationship with his father and his obsession with the details from their past seem like thematic cousins.  Early on in this story things are obviously tense as “we are both much too old there could yet be a sort of peace, not an end to your unrelenting reproaches, but at least a mitigation of them.”  If history never repeats then why have generations upon generations of experiential patriarchal repressiveness informed the creative mind to spectacularly effect?

Kafka attempts to gut punch in this letter he wrote to his father but was never received.  With such a wonderful writer, the excoriation is both complex and vividly written.  Through this work a man is conjured back to life.  “The rhetorical devices you used in bringing me up, which were extremely effective, and at least in my case never failed, included:  insults, threats, irony, spiteful laughter and – strangely -self-pity.”  The fact that this type of father-ruler still exists today makes the work relevant and perhaps even oddly therapeutic.

Personal references continued to stream into my mind.  There is a section where Kafka writes that his father’s behavior is enigmatic like all tyrants.  You will be hard pressed not to think of Donald Trump while absorbing those descriptors.  The piece also works as a metaphor for business relationships.  Different people respond to different motivators.  Some thrive under dictators, others wither and their desire for success and happiness remains unfilled.  In the hands of an uber talented and contemplative writer, the result can be quite dazzlingly dark.

There is a reason some boys gravitate to football and others to Ru Paul’s Drag Race.  What Kafka is positing is that his existence would be far less tormented had he not been who he was, a “heady” child with an ability to store a vast amount of data in his mind.  His grievances are numerous and, brilliantly, even pointed inward.  I absolutely loved this letter.

The setting (Oona Curley and Stacey DeRosier) nominally appears to be a storage area in an office-like environment filled with boxes and boxes of filed documents.  The room really functioned as the inside brain apparatus of Kafka himself.  (Another reference came to mind:  Matt Ruff’s novel Set This House on Fire.)  When narrator Michael Guagno walks over to a shelf, you know he’s reaching in to pull out another memory, yet another trauma safely stored, sadly protected and never forgotten.

Mr. Guagno’s reading is akin to an excellent audiobook performance.  Being able to be claustrophobic in this space with him adds to the entire experience.  James Rutherford’s direction nicely varies the camera angles and provides for movement, emphasis and, especially, periods of quiet.  I sat enraptured by the storytelling and frankly amazed what it produced in my own mind.

Technically, this live stream succeeds on all creative levels including lighting, sound and music.  The audience has the ability to change views throughout.  I found the one I preferred early on and stuck with it.  I wanted to concentrate on the words and hear the brutal, guttural angst.  Frank Kafka’s Letter To My Father is unforgettably raw and riveting.  Watch this version alone and see what history your mind repeats.

M-34’s live streaming of Franz Kafka’s Letter To My Father is running on Friday nights and Sunday afternoons through March 28, 2021.

www.m-34.org

Sin Eaters (Theatre Exile)

A couple sits down to dinner in their small basement apartment.  He is unemployed.  She has just landed a temporary position at a tech company.  Mary cannot reveal what the job is because of a non-disclosure agreement.  She is nervous getting back into the workforce.  “It was easy to sit at home and be, like, fuck it.”  That’s the state of the union in 2021 as presented in the play Sin Eaters.

Derek doesn’t want to go back to catering but money is in short supply.  They desperately want to escape this basement dwelling.  Upstairs is a person suffering from PTSD of some sort.  These two seem to be a relatively well adjusted couple.  It’s just the lack of gainful employment keeping them down in their current state.

Mary heads to work and we learn that she is a content scrubber for an internet site.  She’s been hired to flag pornography, gore, racism, hate speech, torture and much, much more.  The images to be reviewed are relentless.  The sheer mass takes a toll on Mary’s psyche.  She doesn’t really let Derek in on the extent, only telling him the job is “challenging.”

There have been a number of recent plays which cover this terrain.  Russian Troll Farm also concerned itself with similar employees.  Sin Eaters, however, is more concerned about the impact on home than the workplace.  The material to process is grueling and thankless.  Then the unthinkable happens.  Mary sees a very disturbing video and believes a crime was committed.  Does she report it?

Bi Jean Ngo portrays Mary.  The most interesting aspect of this character is her unreliability.  She doesn’t trust him.  He doesn’t trust her either for that matter.  There are secrets looming, some of which are spelled out and others which are hinted at.  As a viewer, I trusted neither of them which kept me interested in the plot.

David M. Raine plays the everyday guy yet mysteriously unknowable Derek.  The performance is grounded in realism which nicely offsets an increasingly jarring turn to the phantasmagoric.  I cannot say the balance between realism and eerieness was right on under Matt Pfeiffer’s direction.  The ending in particular is very strong (and intensely off-putting in the best possible way).  The visual details seemed overcooked, however, so the scene lost some of its power.

I can say that the staging, variety of camera angles and easy scene changes were very well done.  Anna Moench’s play feels like a trip through a fun house. There are twists and turns. The mirrors where we see can ourselves and the images that will be distorted.  Your mind starts to play tricks on you.  Fear creeps in to join anxiety.  There’s no telling which direction that combination will take you.  That’s the edge we are asked to traverse in Sin Eaters.

Ms. Moench gently touches on the play’s themes but vivid spookiness (and revolting unseen imagery) is what drives the entertainment factor.  Many will not enjoy this play due to its content.  Some sections lag as we contemplate Mary’s evolving state of mind.  And what about Derek’s?  Evaluated as a whole unit, Sin Eaters is imperfect like its characters (and, by extension, us).  Sin Eaters is also wildly paranoid which makes you pay attention.

Sin Eaters is being presented by South Philadelphia’s Theatre Exile through February 28, 2021.

www.theatreexile.org

theaterreviewsfrommyseat/russiantrollfarm

RIIICHARD (Teatro LATEA)

“Now is the winter of our discontent” begins Shakespeare’s Richard III.  In an adaptation by Norman Briski, all of the dark moodiness and paranoia remain intact.  As in the original, most of the violence remains off-stage but is central to the plot.  RIIICHARD is a short film which captures a portion of this version of the story.

Riiichard tells us early on that he is “an honest murderer.”  The spirit of this piece is both an artistic interpretation of the excessively violent title character as well as a commentary on society in general.  Bruno Giraldi plays Riiichard with verve.  By the time he barks “let’s have fun with death,” you know he’s not kidding.

The strength of this work is in its mood setting and scene changes.  A tortured monologue is followed by two soldiers presumably in combat training.  Rock, paper, scissors is the battle of choice here.  Josefna Lausrica and Vanna Frezza are the ensemble cast who alternate from lightening the mood to ritualistic dancing.  Why did Riiichard become a soldier?  “To get rid of my tenderness.”

My favorite scene involved a harsh conversation with his mother (Jane Ives).  Her seething anger and contempt for a son who grew into a monster is on full display.  As Riiichard descends further and further into his violent escapades, moments like these fuel the increasing paranoia and bloodlust in his brain.

The film is only twenty minutes long yet abounds with variety and creativity.  Storytelling is secondary to artistic flourishes.  Knowing Shakespeare’s play helps understand the context and its influence on this interpretation.  Anyone, however, will recognize the heinous evilness of a tyrannical maniac.

This relatively low budget film is especially notable for the lighting design by Solangue Falla Crespo.  Shadows are meaningful.  Colors change moods.  Spotlights frame the action.  RIIICHARD is always interesting to watch.  The drumbeats of war ensure that violence is never too far away.

The play is multilingual with Riiichard flowing freely between Spanish and English.  What could be a distraction is instead additive to understanding this character.  The words are important but the actions even more so.  You don’t need to speak the language to know there is a madman in your presence.

Presented by Teatro LATEA, RIIICHARD is the first of a planned three part trilogy of this play.  This filming can be accessed via their website.  It’s a dark twenty minutes but it does not fail to have “fun with death.”

RIIICHARD will begin ongoing streaming on the Teatro LATEA home page.  The second part in this series is in rehearsals and is expected to stream later this year.

www.teatrolatea.org

The Kitchen Plays (Eden Theater Company)

The kitchen is often referred to as the heart of a home.  The pandemic of the past year has perhaps made this room more frequented than ever.  The Eden Theater Company is presenting three short one act plays collectively themed as The Kitchen Plays.  In these works, the idea of nourishment, or a lack thereof, contemplates all kinds of hunger.

The Passion Project takes place in the cramped kitchen of a dive bar.  Larry is working in “this dump” to make ends meet.  There are little to no acting gigs in a pandemic. His cat is not doing well either.  He’s taken two extra shifts to pay for the cat’s medication.  Cass has stopped by for help on an audition.  In between work dramas both big and small, they read lines, or try to.

There is a richly developed comparison between these two differently aged souls.  Larry’s cat is his companion.  He fears what will happen as “loneliness is a tricky bitch at my age.”  In this era of isolation and quarantine, Larry says what many of us think:  “I’m wasn’t ready for this kind of alone.”  Cass is there ostensibly for help but rather functions as the beacon of light leading this weathered man safely to shore.

The realism in the performances from Larry Fleischman and playwright Cassandra Paras were perfectly suited to this material.  The claustrophobia of the tight space and the oppressiveness of a hostile work environment were effectively realized through Byron Anthony’s direction.  This play was my favorite of the three with its deft balancing of despair and hope, of loneliness and connectivity, and for its honesty in addressing the urgent needs of the human psyche.

Ginger Bug self-describes itself as “Bob Fosse meets The Great British Baking Show meets Upright Citizen’s Brigade.”  That is certainly an apt description for the start of Jake Brasch’s play.  For nine months, Perry (Mr. Brasch) and Janine (Madeleine Barr) have performed “The Great Tuesday Cook-off” on Zoom from their separate kitchens.  The opening theme song is a silly hoot memorably rhyming Mary Berry with Guy Fieri.

The food is not basic like simple crostini.  It’s much more involved than that.  Perry has made “garlic red pepper bruschetti fermented for three weeks before placed on top of sourdough crostini and drizzled with an eight year old balsamic reduction.”  From the tone of the two friends, you can tell there is an easy relatability between them.

A short rib dish will not go as planned, however.  As a result of this particular shoe leather, the play takes a hard turn.  These two friends are coping with social distancing with varying levels of success.  Nine months of cooking show feel differently depending on your perspective.  You relate to one chef whose relishes this weekly highlight.  You relate to the other chef who is exhausted from the expectations of five course meals.

The drama explored in Ginger Bug felt a bit heavy handed to me but the concept was intriguing.  Hard not to feel sorry for the guy who names his sourdough starter Marvin.  And also, in equal measurements, laugh with him.

Tara (Owen Alleyne) has invited his estranged parents over for dinner in the last play in this trilogy titled For the Family.  They reached out after not having spoken for more than three years.  While too casual a dish, baked ziti appears to be what’s for dinner.  Madison Harrison’s play investigates the minds of younger individuals than in the previous two segments.

A roommate (Danielle Kogan) slugs some liquor before heading out to a gathering without wearing a mask.  Tara laments the decision made to host the parents for dinner.  An unsurprising plot twist follows.  Tara realizes, “I never should have called.”  This final play certainly puts a mirror to current times.  These characters, however, did not come across as three dimensional so I found myself uninvolved with and unmoved by their story.

The Kitchen Plays continues performances live via Zoom on February 11, 12, 19 and 20, 2021.

www.edentheater.org

Pim’s Metamorphoses

How many people’s lives have been terribly impacted by the large and small disruptions caused by the global pandemic?  Neil Redfield, the writer and star of Pim’s Metamorphoses, is one of them.  He has returned to his childhood home.  He is thinking.  “Something about being in this room again.”

Originally written as a solo piece while attending Southern Methodist University in 2019, Mr. Redfield has adapted his work into a live digital performance.  Similar to Ovid’s seminal Metamorphoses, this is a poem.  It may not be an epic per se, but it is wildly ambitious in scope.  The work is clearly personal.  Setting the show in his actual childhood bedroom in the middle of a pandemic with the world closing in and abundant time to overthink anything and everything is truly inspired timing.

What was this young boy really afraid of as a child?  Why did he fear the sun failing to rise each and every morning?  Those are the questions posed at the beginning of this work.  Was the sun breaking its promise?  The viewer is soon to find out in a series of sections both fantastical and mundane.  He begins his journey falling out of a window.  The video angles were cleverly executed.

Mr. Redfield and his Director, Ann Noling, remotely conceived this production.  This performance lasts approximately ninety minutes.  One person and one long poem in a room.  Along with Scenographer Matthew Deinhart, the creative team nicely developed movement and varied locations which were effective in setting mood and changing scenes.  There’s even a little puppetry.  While the technical elements are often simple in design, they are nicely executed and well rehearsed.  The lighting effect utilized for a scene with the sun reminded me of sci-fi series from the 1950’s or 60’s.

The writing here, however, is the true star of the piece.  The poem directly speaks to the angst of a child who “really, really, really wanted to meet his  father, his real father.”  He imagines him “with an overpowering presence that no one could deny.”  It’s no small leap that he turns out to be one of the gods.  That’s how the fictional Pim connects to Ovid’s poem.  This section of the play and performance is a particular highlight.  Headphones are recommended when watching as the sound effects (Caroline Eng) enhance the storytelling.

Character transitions are always thoughtful and occasionally outstanding.  (I’ll not reveal too much here.)  A simple switch to the Scholar finds Mr. Redfield seating next to a shelf with books.  Perithemus is “a bit prickly, he had friends, who also saw the world as predictable phenomena.”  A child grows and finds his tribe.  Many are successful.  Perithemus’ storyline has his world turned upside down.  How significantly?  “He felt electricity over his skin.”

An example of the gorgeous prose:  “And Perithemus felt a firework flower swell inside his entire body and turn it into tingling lights, for the first time, he was higher than the clouds and he could see everything at once, every person who has ever kissed every other person in all of time, just for a moment – before falling slowly, blissfully back into the gravity of the supermassive object his lips has just tasted.”

Is Mr. Redfield’s performance as blissful as that kiss?  That’s a big ask.  I did enjoy and admire certain segments and characterizations more than others.  As an entire concept, however, there is beauty in the language and in the analysis of one’s place in the world and in the journey to get there.  The influence your parents had – and have – on your very existence and the way you perceive the world, for better or for worse.

Pim’s Metamorphoses captures this particular moment in time by creating a theatrical, whimsical and profound link to our socially distanced and isolated lives.  Now is as good a time as any to try this:  “He woke up as something else.”

Pim’s Metamorphoses is being performed live digitally though January 31, 2021.

www.pimsmetamorphoses.com

A Day (The Cherry Artists’ Collective)

The alarm goes off.  You scan your horoscope.  “Hey, look at that, it says that you should keep to yourself today and limit contact with the outside world.”  Doesn’t that line seem so appropriate for our pandemic filled 2020?  While A Day was written a few years ago, Gabrielle Chapdelaine’s play has been given its English language premiere in an inventive live streamed performance.

The four main characters spend their time navigating a day in their life.  “Your horoscope tells you to be bold today.  Be bold.”  Starting at midnight, this play is structured as an hour by hour exploration of four people with different personalities.  The interesting conceit is that much of the time they narrate and comment on each other’s story.

Alphonso (Jahmar Ortiz) is the cheerful, optimistic, physically fit one.  Debs (Erica Steinhagen) tells us that he made a smoothie.  He makes a little extra for his neighbor.  Nico (Sylvie Yntema), however, sees the neighbor “with the problematic jokes” as one who “doesn’t seem like the type who finds delight in blended fruit.”  Translated by Josephine George, there are witty gems like that scattered throughout this play.

Alphonso is also a movie buff who particularly enjoys classic films.  As movies are referenced, the footnotes display on the screen.  There are a few good jokes which come from these as well.  The best parts of A Day are found in the details.  Alphonso narrates Harris’ constipation issues.  Sitting on the toilet, he plays twenty seven rounds of solitaire, winning eleven.  Alphonso then concludes, “but what would actually fill you with relief would be to relieve yourself.”

Harris (Karl Gregory) tells the spunky, obsessive Nico that she sometimes feels “like an extra in your own life.”  He elaborates further.  “Especially at work, you feel like the poor extra in the samurai movie who accidentally got kicked in the face when one of the main samurais mounted his horse.”  There’s plenty of sadness lurking amidst the quirkiness of these lives in all sorts of array and disarray.

Directed by Samuel Buggeln and Wendy Dann, this live streamed production reminded me of the opening credits for the television sitcom, The Brady Bunch.  Each person in their own box looking at the others in their boxes.  Except here they talk about the other people and also about themselves.  The four actors perform from separate green screen spaces on the stage of the State Theater in Ithaca.  The effect fit the play beautifully and was nicely realized.

Parts of A Day are a bit heavy handed.  I assume that is an intentional reflection on everyday life; our fears, our worries and our insecurities.  In certain sections, my mind wandered as the character’s tales looped around many mood changes.  The details, however, never failed to disappoint.  And there’s even a helpful cure provided for us all.  “When the boat starts to sink, we’ll take a ramen break.”

A Day will be live streamed through November 21, 2020.  Advance ticket purchases are available.

www.thecherry.org

The School for Wives (Molière in the Park)

Prolific French playwright Molière wrote The School for Wives in 1662.  This comedy was controversial at the time.  A man is so intimidated by women and the idea of marriage that he decides to raise a perfect wife.  It’s a centuries old variation of The Stepford Wives but told mostly from the male point of view.  From the perspective of today and one hundred years after the 19th amendment was passed, this amusing story remains a relevant piece of theater.

Arnolphe (Tonya Pinkins) and his friend Chrysalde (Christina Pitter) begin the play in a conversation about women and their “long suffering husbands.”  Arnolphe boasts about the type of wife he wants.  “So simple is the girl I’m going to wed / I’ve no fear for horns upon my head.”  The rhyme schemes are very entertaining in Richard Wilbur’s translation, a version which appeared on Broadway in 1971.

He continues his rumination against the “smart ones,” notably “women who versify too much.”  His plan is nearly complete.  A young lady was reared in a convent from the age of four under his careful control.  Her “good and modest ignorance” was honed as he wished.  Now she resides in one of his homes with two servants as naive as she.  The marriage will commence and he will have a young wife who will not challenge him or his male superiority.

On his way to the house, Arnolphe runs into a friend’s son, Horace (Kaliswa Brewster).  He confides his covert love story with a young lady.  Apparently, a “blind fool” has sequestered her.  Horace does not know he is divulging his secret to the fool himself.  A series of increasingly cunning scenes follow.

Agnes (Mirirai Sithole) is so incapable of dishonesty that she vapidly discloses her innocently amorous suitor.  She has no idea about the wedding plans.  Arnolphe gives her a book about the maxims of marriage which list out the duties of a woman which was, of course, written by a man.  The first maxim is to love, honor and obey.  Those words were still in marriage vows three centuries after this play was written.

All of that makes The School for Wives an interesting historical artifact which highlights how far we have come in our thinking.  It also highlights the continuing chasm between equality.  The eighth maxim involves a woman being “veiled when she leaves the house.”  That male domination is still practiced today in certain cultures.

There are laughs in this play for sure.  The bumbling servants and Arnolphe’s increasing frustrations keep the kettle boiling on the stove.  In order for this play to shine, however, the comedy has to be front and center.  A live streamed format with no audience laughter was a deterrent to enjoying the comings and goings.  Pauses did not happen when an audience might burst into a howl.  The situations just kept rolling along.

This production also suffered in comparison to other multi-location streams presented in the last month, including the very clever Russian Troll Farm: A Workplace Comedy.  There were interesting backdrops and some fun imagery in this show but there were also clunky line readings and some obvious confusion as to who was supposed to be speaking.  The effect came across as a tad under-rehearsed.

Directed by Lucie Tiberghien, the play was cast with all women, most of whom are Black actresses.  That added another interesting layer to consider on top of the domination and subjugation between white women and white men four hundred years ago.  Equality remains elusive.  Artists must continue to point that out no matter how much progress or how many centuries have passed.

This production can be recommended for those who may not know this play as it does entertain and feels important to consider as our culture hurtles further toward conservatism.  The show also features a very memorable performance by Carolyn Michelle Smith in the dual roles of Notary and Oronte.  The screen came to life with her extraordinary facial expressions.

Moliére in the Park will replay The School for Wives through October 28, 2020.

www.moliereinthepark.org

theaterreviewsfrommyseat/russiantrollfarm

Russian Troll Farm: A Workplace Comedy

TheaterWorks Hartford (Connecticut) and TheatreSquared (Fayetteville, Arkansas) present Russian Troll Farm: A Workplace Comedy with additional support from The Civilians (New York City).  This play was written and produced for a digital platform and performed remotely.  When the credits roll at the end, the cast list includes “volunteer tweeters.”  At this moment in the presidential election cycle, how could you not be interested?

The play opens with a bit of fantastical foreshadowing.  A wizard manages to grow trolls out of the ground.  No one notices they are magical.  The tsar summons his troll army.  He tells them that a neighboring country is choosing a new king.  The trolls need to ensure that “they choose a fool.”

Sara Gancher has written this comedy which is reflective of a major news item from the last five years.  Russians interfered with the 2016 presidential election.  Ms. Gancher takes us into the world of the Internet Research Agency in St. Petersburg.  Right from the beginning, we know what this company thinks.  “Americans are idiots.”

Depending on each employee, the outlook of their job is different.  The bombastic Steve (Ian Lassiter), a disgruntled American, seems to believe they are saving the world.  Nikolai (Greg Keller) thinks what they are doing is evil, “but I want to do a good job anyway.”  Nerdy Egor (Haskell King, deadpan hilarious) previously worked in loss prevention at a WalMart in Nebraska.  He cranks out a lot of volume but is chastised for too much Nazi content in his messaging.

The situations are indeed funny.  Should you read the manual so you understand Americans?  No, since you are “better off watching House of Cards or Ru Paul’s Drag Race.”  Is this a job or is it a war?  The characters debate whether they are mongrels in the golden horde or artists who are supplying mankind’s eternal need for stories.

Ms. Gancher makes sure that her tale contains some prickly zingers which make us reflect and consider the mission.  No one growing up in the U.S.S.R. ever thought their country would end.  But it did.  “Never doubt a group of people can change the world,”  she writes.  Additionally, “Hillary kills babies in dungeon tunnels under Disney World.”

Killary Clinton jokes aside, there is a core sadness which I felt while watching this play.  People actually believe this crap.  My parents consume this horseshit by the shovelful.  Russian Troll Farm is inherently a comedy draped in an invisible cloak of horror.  The abandonment of critical thinking is one of America’s greatest failures.  No one said it more clearly than Donald Trump when he uttered, “I love the uneducated.”

Office politics and sexual misadventures also play a part in the plot.  There are tensions with the boss Ljuba, a tough, old, alley cat of a woman.  When one of her employees wants to leave, she warns, “If you don’t come back to work you might want to leave the country.”  Then she adds, “nothing personal.”  The fourth part of the play focuses on Ljuba and it is one of the highlights of a creatively structured and diversely written piece.  As Ljuba, Mia Katigbak is simply excellent.

The entire cast shines in their various characterizations.  The multi-location digital collaboration has been capably and confidently directed by Jared Mezzocchi and Elizabeth Williamson.  These actors are fully engaged with each other and not simply facing out to the streaming audience.  There are many visual details to enjoy.

Is anyone a hero or even likable?  That is not the point in a play which asks the question, “What’s the difference between Moses and Stalin?”  In the midst of another presidential campaign, our intelligence agencies are again warning about foreign government’s meddling with our democracy.  Russian Troll Farm could not be timelier.  It’s billed as a comedy – and there are indeed laughs – but they often cut more deeply.  That makes this play worth seeking out.  That also makes the voting ballot worth casting during these next few weeks.

Russian Troll Farm: A Workplace Comedy is streaming live through October 24, 2020.  After that, the play will have encore viewing on demand through November 2nd.

www.russiantrollfarm.com

Far Away (PTP/NYC)

A good creepy play can get under the viewer’s skin.  Caryl Churchill’s Far Away is one such piece.  The setting is a “familiar country, over the period of several decades.”  While the country may be familiar, the goings on are most certainly not.  A sense of dread, foreboding and discomfort hook you in quickly until it is impossible to put your feet on solid ground.

Premiering in 2000, this play is considered one of Ms. Churchill’s finest works.  It is easy to see why PTP/NYC chose this as one of their four streamed shows this fall.  The people who inhabit this world don’t trust other people, are lied to and suspect widespread corruption in companies and government.  Furthermore, alliances are breaking down and reforming in an increasingly dangerous and hostile world.

The first part is a conversation between young Joan (Lilah May Pfeiffer) and her Aunt Harper (Nesba Crenshaw).  Joan is having trouble going to bed.  Her Aunt advises that it’s often difficult when in a new place.  Joan disagrees.  She’s been many places.  Why is she here?  That is not explained.  The beauty of the writing in Far Away lies in its murkiness.

Joan slipped out of her bedroom window earlier that evening and climbed onto a tree.  She caught a glimpse of her Uncle outside in the darkness.  What was he doing?  Her Aunt tells her that he likes to get fresh air.  Joan claimed she heard a noise?  What kind of noise?  The answers are vague.  Through a series of half-truths and outright lies from her Aunt, Joan continues to pry.  What is the world she inhabits that makes her so penetratingly perceptive?

In the middle section of this play, Joan is older (Caitlin Duffy) and has just begun a job in a hatmaking company.  She is conversing with Todd (Ro Boddie), a more experienced hatmaker.  There seems to be a never ending need for hats.  They are used in the parades.  Todd remarks one day that he is tired since he stayed up late watching the trials.  As time passes their relationship grows.  Is there something untrustworthy about this company and the government which needs to be disclosed?

The final section broadens the scope of this play to consider a world in conflict.  Living beings are destroying alliances and forging new ones.  The mysteries deepen the intrigue.  What exactly happened “when the elephants went to the Dutch”?  When this play ends after forty minutes, everything and nothing is illuminated.  This is a foggy, eerily conceived dystopia and an immensely satisfying glimpse of an uncertain future.

Cheryl Faraone directed this production which works nicely in a streamed format.  The performances are all quite good and I was hooked from start to finish.  This play is especially recommended for those want to be on the right side of history.  In Far Away, it is not easy to discern good vs. evil.  That’s not unlike our world in 2020.  In America today, so many people define those two seemingly simple terms differently.

Far Away is streaming until midnight on Sunday, October 18, 2020 and can be accessed via the PTP/NYC website.

www.ptpnyc.org

American Dreams (Working Theater)

American Dreams, in particular American Dreamers, are the subjects of this live streamed interactive entertainment.  A reservation is required to gain access.  A voiceover announces “we’ve entered a temporary government facility and security zone.”  Happy whistling plays until the show commences.

A game show ensues which has a clever conceit.  Three people compete for the one available United States citizenship opening.  The Deputy Director of Otter (India Nicole Burton) warms up the audience and gleefully promises different group of citizens for every show!  The three men on this night were from Israel, Mexico and Pakistan.

Before the game show actually starts, there is some banter with the delegates assembled.  A rather sickly group sing-a-long of the National Anthem occurs which seems intentional.  Our amusingly flippant hosts for the competition arrive via stream (Jens Rasmussen and playwright Leila Buck).  This is the third season of the show.  The “three contestants compete for Columbus’ gold.”  The winner is granted “immediate citizenship into the greatest nation on Earth.”  The sarcasm and irony is most welcome.

Round one starts with a section called How America Works.  Points are awarded and subtracted throughout the game.  Previously chosen volunteers join in for America’s Favorites and try to help the hopeful immigrants get more points.  The evening I saw, all three helpers guessed wrong.  I got all three correct perhaps because I am a better citizen than they.

The interactivity with the audience is amongst the stronger aspects of this entertainment.  Polling was fun and worked smoothly.  The downfall is that it was not used enough.  Other forced participatory moments, such as the many requests for a show of hands, happened far too much.  When half of the audience on screen does not use their camera, the execution suffered and it showed.

Part of the game show enables the contestants to try for an O-1 Visa by demonstrating a particular talent.  One audience member described a dream she had.  Usman (Imran Sheikh), the Pakestani, had to create a drawing of that dream.  Adil (Ali Andre Ali), the Israeli, shared a recipe with the hosts, all of whom were socially distant.  The Mexican contestant, Alejandro (Andrew Aaron Valdez), said his special skill was fixing people up when they get hurt.  He was deported even though he arrived in the country at the age of five and his mother paid taxes.  He also served in the National Guard.  The storylines do get serious occasionally and the moments are nicely performed by all three men.

The game show feels elongated as there are sections in which momentum slows considerably.  More interactivity – polling, trivia – could really spice up the fun quotient.  I would tamper down the voice and thumbs up requests since they don’t seem to work as well as designed.  We are all getting used to streaming dysfunction in 2020.

A sharp-edged satire about what it means to become an American citizen is surely a ripe target.  A game show format that plays with the silliness of the form is a good choice to have a little laugh yet make a few key points.  Overall, American Dreams falls short of its ambitions by not being darkly ironic enough.

The ending does offer surprise, however.  Do you get to find out who won?  Or if all or none of them won?  That, my fellow citizens, is for you to find out for yourselves.

American Dreams is scheduled to run for seven weeks through nine different theaters around the country.  The Working Theater’s live production is October 20 – 25, 2020.  Links for other theaters can be found here.

www.americandreamsplay.com

www.theworkingtheater.org