Don’t Exaggerate (desire and abuse)

PTP/NYC is known for producing politically aware plays.  They present theatrically complex and thought-provoking works of contemporary social and cultural relevance.  For their abbreviated season this year, they are streaming four productions over four weeks.  The second one, Don’t Exaggerate (desire and abuse), certainly fits the bill.  Howard Barker’s work is subtitled, “a political statement in the form of hysteria.”

This forty minute stream of consciousness is delivered by Robert Emmet Lunney.  He portrays a Hungarian soldier who was killed in World War I.  His spirit, however, is back to make commentary about the world since then.  This monologue was first performed in 1984 and is not dated one bit.  So many off-hand remarks land darkly and humorously but also feel current.

Right from the start, you understand why this piece is on this theater company’s schedule this year.  “The truth is dying / It is praised so much / Don’t keep on about the truth.”  Death is a major theme which perhaps seems obvious from a dead war soldier.  The tone is serious and blunt with comments like “suicide is the highest moment of consciousness.”  He views Europe as “death’s estate.”  Later in the show, truth and death combine and we are made to realize “the dead have all the facts.”

All is not gloom and doom in this wildly non-linear wordplay.  The world is an “avalanche of falling periodicals” and “everyone is in print.”  Written over three decades ago, that observation is even more true today.  Social media and non-stop news cycles make for a never ending avalanche.

There are many societal zingers scattered throughout which entertain.  One particular favorite was “never underestimate the reproductive powers of the decadent.”  Mr. Barker has a disgusting opinion of mankind in general.  That viewpoint pops up in serious commentary and also in hilarious one liners including a throwaway line about hearing “choruses of violated sheep.”

Climate change hits hard here as well.  Rising temperatures of the planet are contributing to cancers in the population.  A little later on, he comes back to this notion and links back to his running commentary about truths.  An “increase in cancers” is equivalent to an “increase in lies.”  There are so many fascinating parallels to our 21st century cavalcade of large scale dramas happening worldwide.

Here’s a tip:  “you can always take an intellectual for a ride if you stare into his eyes.”  I love Mr. Barker’s writing and the rambling style which managed to loop around in a whirlpool of sarcasm and despair.

The central performance by Mr. Lunney could have dripped with even more sarcasm.  I wonder if the monologue might come across differently spoken by a young man rather than one wiser with age.  A fresh faced soldier who has an axe to grind.  The acerbic tone might be even more disconcerting.  The live streaming, however, was a great medium to appreciate this work.  Director Richard Romagnoli’s in-your-face close ups kept the focus intense.

Don’t Exaggerate (desire and abuse) is available on PTP/NYC’s You Tube channel through Sunday, October 4, 2020.  The next production is Dan O’Briens The House in Scarsdale: A Memoir for the Stage beginning October 8th.

youtube/ptpnyc

Zero Cost House (Pig Iron Theatre, Philadelphia, PA)

Sometimes you just have to let a play wash over you.  Not try to ride the waves and steer your way through.  Just let whatever happen.  Zero Cost House is one such experience.  The oceanic volume of big picture themes and insightfully sharp details cannot be controlled by the viewer.  Toshiki Okada’s play does not let you be in control.

In 2011, this playwright began a collaboration with Philadelphia’s Pig Iron Theatre on an adaptation of Thoreau’s seminal Walden.  Then the Fukushima meltdown happened.  Mr. Okada changed course and his resulting work is not only a nostalgic trip to a more simpler time but also a political memoir.  The Japanese government is held to account for its handling of the tragedy.  In our time of COVID-19, the parallels to any government’s inaction during a crisis make for an easy parallel to draw.

The structure of the play is loopy, twisty and bendy.  Cast members play multiple roles and share multiple parts.  Time moves forward and backward repeatedly.  Linear this is not.  Director Dan Rothenberg beautifully orchestrates all of this action and philosophizing.  The Zoom experience proves to be a perfect presentation vehicle.  If you like big, weighty themes delivered through fascinating and unusual scenes by an exceptionally strong creative team, then Zero Cost House is a must-see.

You will find deadpan humor.  Past Okada (Aigner Mizzelle), the playwright’s younger self is writing a play but doesn’t know what’s next.  Current Okada (Dito van Reigersberg), another character tells his youthful version, “this is a common problem with writer’s block.”  There is playful humor such as when Thoreau is asked if he googles himself.  The answer?  “Yeah, everyday.”

The juxtaposition of writing a play about oneself at different ages is just one of many conceits.  The younger Okada is thoroughly obsessed with Thoreau’s book and the messages of a simple life and living in nature.  The playwright brings in Kyohei Sakaguchi (Will Brill, fantastic) into this work as a modern day Thoreau (Alex Torra).  He is famous for his Zero Yen Project which involves the study of structures built at no cost, such as shanties made by the homeless.  In their own times and ways, both thinkers advocate for the simpler life.

Philosophical ideas burst forth frequently during this two hour play.  “I didn’t want to waste my life in a company to follow the rules made by society.”  Or,  “I want to be rich with time.”  Immature people need to pretend they are arrogant.  To which the playwright notes, “unfortunately I am unfathomably far away from this kind of naivete.”

Adding into this heady stew is the writer’s agent (Mary McCool), a rabbit couple (Saori Tsukada), a Björk cover band and assorted visuals.  To say this is meta doesn’t quite capture it.  It’s mega-meta.  The clarity of the storytelling is astonishing.  One character says that they are “peeling myself away from the layer of the ordinary.”  You can do the same by catching this extraordinary production.

Reflecting on the creativity required to both write and present this play was an additional bonus.  The words are laden with details worth hearing.  Watch the actors fully inhabit these people with memorable facial expressions and movement.  The presentation of visual effects and miniatures by Maiko Matsushima adds to the fun.  Missing live theater?  Zero Cost House might convince you otherwise.

Take the time to go visit Walden again or for the first time.  Breathe in the fine air.  Catch a fish for dinner.  Think.  About yourself, life and your purpose in the world.  This play stopped me in my tracks and washed over me like the tsunami which hit Japan and caused the 2011 crisis.  Watching it, I felt adrift but excited.  With a rescuer as surefooted as Mr. Okada, the times are a-changing for the better.

Pig Iron Theatre has another livestream Zoom presentation of Zero Cost House scheduled for Friday, September 25th.

www.pigiron.org

12 Angry Men… and Women: The Weight of the Wait (The Billie Holiday Theatre, Brooklyn)

“Get out of the car.”  “Shut the fuck up before we beat your ass.”  So begins the searing storytelling in 12 Angry Men… and Women:  The Weight of the Wait.  Based on a book which explored the black male experience in dealing with police brutality, The Billie Holiday Theatre updated a previously performed play to also includes female voices.  Obviously the material is timely.  Predictably it is upsetting.  The production is gripping and relentless, like the racism on display.

A preview of the creation and celebration of the first Black Lives Matter Plaza in New York City begins this streamed theatrical event.  The play was performed live last Saturday night on the mural in the middle of the street. The theater and this show are located in the middle of the Bedford-Stuyvesant section of Brooklyn.  A fitting locale as this area has been a center of African-American culture for the last century.

In this new century, more stories need to be told.  Director Dr. Indira Etwaroo makes the mission clear in her letter to the audience.  “We must pass a better world on to the next generation. The time has come to stand together. The time for justice is now.”

Musicians from the New York Philharmonic begin the show with a musical overture.  The sirens begin and lights are flashing.  A view into the terrors and humiliations which follow are clear-eyed, angry and emotional.

Five actors perform their monologues (with some intersecting dialogue) in separate acting modules.  The production design and especially the lighting effects ratchet up feelings of claustrophobia and intentional targeting.  Staged in the middle of the street at night lends an additional air of tension, especially in concert with the stories’ settings.  The visible yellow Black Lives Matter painted on the road firmly grounds the work in the now.  The urgency demanded by a serious docudrama is on full display.

The first vignette told is one of a criminal justice reporter for the New York Times.  He traveled to Salisbury, Maryland for a story.  His head was shoved down on a police vehicle.  Of course this was a case of mistaken accusation but no apology was offered.  “Sir, this is the south.  We have different laws down here.”  The unspoken word that entered my mind was “still.”

These stories are by no means focused geographically.  An English woman and her brother were driving near Los Angeles when they were pulled over.  She had not lived in America long enough to understand how the police functioned here.  Her experience put her “squarely in a sub-region of the borders of American blackness.”

A Harvard lawyer is harassed while making a phone call in Boston’s airport.  A teen describes everyday with the DT’s, or local detectives, in her neighborhood.  More car pullovers.  Scenes of abject terror and fear.  Tough choices between one’s rights and dignity, or death.  The material is as hard as is the subject matter.  It is supposed to be.  And it succeeds.

A story of a black man going to a bar during a return home to Asheville, North Carolina overwhelmed me with its cruelty.  Another horrifying tale when an illegal left turn resulted in 45 stitches in the head.  How about a Professor of Criminal Procedures walking home at night in his neighborhood?  Don’t think you can face this material?  You must, especially if this is not the America you see each and every day.  Let artists help us all understand and reflect and share.

How else are we going to heal from the all-too recent scars of the Breonna Taylor tragedy?  12 Angry Men… and Women ends with Ms. Taylor’s mother’s words.  You will hear how she learned what happened to her daughter.  It is sickening and heartbreaking.  This is vital theater and needs to be experienced for both its power and its purpose.  And, most importantly, to help us push forward to a more just society tomorrow.

“We must pass a better world on to the next generation. The time has come to stand together. The time for justice is now.”

12 Angry Men… and Women:  The Wait of the Weight is streaming on You Tube on the page of The Billie Holiday Theatre.

youtube/12angrymenandwomen

Tolerance Party: #1 “Ice-Breakers” (The Cell Theatre)

In a premier thirty minute episode, The Cell Theatre presented Tolerance Party:  #1 :  Ice Breakers” in a live stream Zoom format.  Six strangers are brought together by an unknown entity for a group chat.  After various hellos and “hi, hi’s” they get down to the task at hand.  One of them asks, “Did everyone bring art supplies?”

They begin to create a self-portrait which should express how they feel about themselves within the world around them.  That is certainly an interesting angle to consider in this current environment of monumental political strife, heightened tensions of racial inequality and a global pandemic.  The group is asked to remain anonymous so whenever they share personal information such as a wife’s name, the data is bleeped.

The audience is also asked to be secretive and not use real names in the chat which occurs throughout the performance.  The chat can often be highly entertaining such as when one person pointed out that “baby Yoda looks stressed.”  I laughed out loud as the reference was clever and on point.

The six characters are a mixture of men and women, younger and middle aged.  One lady who is referred to as “asterisks” is particularly kooky.  Her self-portrait was done in advance.  When she presents it at the end, you are reminded of the students in middle school who handed in a book report with an embellished cover.  One audience member chatted, “we love an overachiever.”

In between the silliness and, frankly, dry spells, there are interesting questions considered.  One section of this short play focused on the question “Why does language fail us?”  Here’s an insightful answer:  “I don’t think it allows for in betweens and spectrum and nuance.”

I don’t really have an idea where this series will be headed in the next episode.  Apparently the audience chats will influence the fate of the characters in the future.  As a first episode, this play was a short, quirky diversion.  A little more time with the characters and more insight into their personalities should add the extra dimension required to sustain a multi-part serial.

www.thecelltheatre.org

Seclusion Smörgåsbord VII

The seventh entry into my Seclusion Smörgåsbord series features dance and a funeral.  While a death entertainment may sound like a bad idea during this pandemic, this one is a comedy of sorts.  If you might want to stage your own memorial service, this also may provide some inspiration.

Wooden (HERE Arts Center)

This Laura Peterson dance was filmed on November 12, 2011.  In Wooden, nature (and possibly evolution) is invoked.  The first part is “Ground” which is followed by “Trees.”  Sometimes when I watch dance, the movement and storytelling becomes impenetrable.  Both of these pieces contained memorable visuals and striking movements.  Bodies on the ground barely moving.  Lights go off.  The bodies are in another location when the lights go back on.  I felt as if I were watching the rise of animate forms from Earth’s history.

Trees began more straightforwardly.  The dancers were symbolic.  Their limbs were branches, erratically changing positions.  The lighting design and shadow work was exceptionally additive to the environment.  Dissonant sounds like computerized rhythmic noises accompanied this dance.  Near the end of this one there was some very energetic unison choreography.  The meaning escaped me but it was likely challenging to dance.  Both pieces were a bit repetitive for my tastes and I found myself losing interest.

HERE Arts Center’s Facebook watch parties are on Wednesday nights.  Next week:  “In Nick Lehane’s Chimpanzee, an aging, isolated chimpanzee pieces together the fragments of her childhood in a human family. Bleak reality bleeds to vivid memory in this physically expressive puppet play. Inspired by true events.”

www.facebook.com/hereartscenter

Allegro Brillante (New York City Ballet)

In replacement of its spring season, the New York City Ballet is streaming some of its classic performances over the next six weeks.  Tuesdays will feature ballets from its founders, George Balanchine and Jerome Robbins.  On Fridays, they will showcase contemporary works.  Each video will run for 72 hours on their homepage, Facebook or You Tube.  Allegro Brillante premiered on March 1, 1956 and this specific performance was taped on January 18, 2017.

Of this ballet, Mr. Balanchine said this particular piece showed “everything I know about classical ballet in thirteen minutes.”  This is crowd pleasing ballet with choreography that beautifully embraces the music of Tschaikovsky’s Piano Concerto No. 3.  Lead dancers Tiler Peck and Andrew Veyette along with four couples swell with the flourishes, flow with the softer sections and leap with when the music demands.  This short highly entertaining work is definitely something to try if you want to experience a taste of classical ballet.

Justin Peck’s world premiere Rotunda from this past February is this weekend’s free streaming dance from the New York City Ballet.

www.nycballet.com

Wild and Precious Life (Playing On Air)

Sheila (Debra Monk) has passed away.  Apparently she was a wild spirit filled with life.  This fifteen minute play begins at her memorial service.  A close friend is reading the recently departed’s favorite poem which has to do with the title of this comedy.  First, however, there are some tears.  The Reverend Sandy takes over and reads an unopened letter from Sheila to her friends.  She has an instruction from the great beyond which results in mourners getting into a fight filled with ridiculous revelations.

There is another message from the beyond and a very thought provoking monologue at the end.  How should one lead their life while they have the chance?  A character considers their admiration for the magical Sheila and what she represents.  The six member cast was directed by Michele O’Brien and features original music from San Francisco’s Misner & Smith.  This taping is a quick and breezy entertainment with an agreeable dosage of heft at its conclusion.  A ten minute Q&A follows the performance.

Wild and Precious Life can be found on Playing on Air’s website.  Past shows are also available on iTunes.

www.playingonair.org

Two Can Play

The phrase “Two Can Play at that game” implies retaliation against an act of deception, deceit or harm.  In Trevor Rhone’s enormously satisfying comedy, two characters engage in a game of wits.  Survival is one theme.  Surviving a twenty year marriage.  Managing to live in a world which has become a gun battleground.  Poverty and joblessness are suffocating.  Dreaming for a better life in America.  Aspiring to being a woman who is more than a domesticated slave.  The flavor is Jamaican but the targets are universal.

Jim and Gloria are attempting to sleep in their Kingston home.  Gunfire is ablaze outside which is nothing new.  Elderly “Pops” is in the back room coughing.  Jim is completely paranoid.  He is nervous and on edge.  Gloria suggests he take more valium.  This play takes place in the 1970’s.  Despite the tensions and horrors of life in this lower middle income neighborhood, the tone is one hundred percent situation comedy.  The foibles and tribulations of a couple after their children have fled the coop for better pastures in America.

All three kids are now illegal immigrants there.  Son Andrew sends a letter home.  Jim is fearful about his children being caught.  “Uncle Sam is a bitch.  Him have satellite up in the sky can read number on dis house.”  Imagine how Jim’s worries would escalate with thirty years of additional and more invasive technologies.  His other son Paul has three jobs.  Dad’s reaction is “God bless America.”

Pops dies in the first scene.  Jim and Gloria hatch a plan to emigrate to the United States.  “We have to go to Uncle Sam.”  In classic comedy fashion they will bicker over money which is very tight.  Jim notes that Gloria is spending too much on “war paint” which could buy extra food.  She retorts, “Yuh still have money for yuh cigarette though.”  Gloria appears smarter and more resourceful than her domineering husband and is learning to gain power in the relationship.

Today she witnessed a man selling a puff for ten cents.  Gloria invests in a carton and negotiates with her husband.  Jim reluctantly pays $1.50 for a cigarette.  He then asks for a match.  That’ll be another ten cents.  The scene is a small one but nicely demonstrates the state of their relationship.  Through all the dangers and disappointments in their lives, they have managed to survive to this point with their classically humorous and recognizable identities.  While this Jamaican couple is drawn as a stereotype, that is clearly playwright Trevor Rhone’s intention.  These two are prototypes of similar dreamers everywhere.

There are tons of laughs written into this comedy which is being revived after its 1985 New York premiere.  Gloria’s frustrations are a common one even today.  She knows her husband is seeing someone else on Tuesday nights.  “You can’t manage your homework properly yet yuh taking on extracurricular activity.”  They are aligned, however, in escaping their increasingly embattled homeland for the promise of America.  We laugh with them due to their personalities but the urgency registers regardless of the humor.

Another satisfying layer of Two Can Play is the emergence of Gloria as a woman.  She’s discovering that her servitude needs to change.  She is no longer property to lend, lease or rent.  Her adventures in this play are thoroughly enjoyable.  When she realizes the only thing holding her marriage together is crisis, her transformation blossoms.  The play nicely builds a believable story arc despite the wildly entertaining comedic escapades.

Joyce Sylvester and Michael Rogers are terrific as Gloria and Jim.  Their chemistry has the appropriately lived-in feel.  They both know how to expertly land a joke and they each have an abundance of them.  Their oversized facial expressions are truly hilarious.  Director Clinton Turner Davis wisely turns up all the dials to showcase this play as a big and very broad comedy.  These two characters could easily carry a television series.  You love their imperfections.  You want to hear about their desires.  And, finally, you root for their ultimate success, whatever that will mean.

The New Federal Theatre production of Two Can Play is running at the Castillo Theatre through April 5, 2020.

www.allstars.org/castillo

La Construcción del Muro (Building the Wall)

Pulitzer Prize winning dramatist Robert Schenkkan (The Kentucky Cycle, All the Way) wrote Building the Wall before Donald Trump won the presidential election.  He said, “I sensed that even during the campaign real and lasting damage had already been done to the country.”  This play was released in 2017 and has been performed in sixty cities worldwide.  Costa Rica’s Teatro Espressivo translated the play into Spanish.  La Construcción del Muro is now back on stage in New York after runs in Costa Rica, El Salvador and Spain.

Mr. Schenkkan released the play in 2017 a day before Trump threatened to paralyze the government if Congress did not clear the way for a border wall.  The work is in the genre of speculative fiction.  The story is a nightmare scenario made believable through easily drawn comparisons to history.  This view equates Trump’s rise as a symptom of problems with Western democracies where white nationalist and supremacist right-wing movements have emerged.

You are asked to enter the theater in a straight line.  The house is split into North and South with a white dividing line down the middle aisle.  Attendees are separated intentionally.  The ushers are prison guards.  On stage there are two chairs on opposite ends of a table in some sort of conference room.  A man is escorted in wearing an orange prison uniform.  He has handcuffs on and takes his seat.

Rick is awaiting trial for unspecified crimes committed during the period where he was put in charge of a detainment center in Texas.  Gloria is a professor and historian who has come to interview him and uncover the truth.  She is not sure what will come of this conversation.  In the original play, Gloria was written as African American.  In this Spanish version, she has been changed to a woman of Latina descent.  That alteration seems to add a vital element of outrage and immediacy to an incendiary topic.

Rick is a Texan who is part of the downwardly mobile lower white middle class.  He struggles to make ends meet for his wife and child.  His job in the border detainment camp is going well and he has increased responsibility.  These prisons are profit-making enterprises so there is significant pressure.  He is fiercely anti-immigration noting “if we don’t have borders, we don’t have a country.”

In Mr. Schenkkan’s imagination, the Justice Department was beginning to shut down America’s prison industrial complex but the election changed that direction.  After an attack in New York, martial law became law.  As Trump said (and this play repeats), there’s a lot of “bad hombres” out there.  Before his arrest Rick was in charge of a stadium which had been co-opted to house illegals and other undesirables.  Everything was fine, he says, before the sanitation problem.

This dystopian fantasy is not especially shocking since the imagined scenarios are grotesque exaggerations of current events.  In 2020, cages are in use at the border.  The Nazi parallels are obvious.  When the conflicting passions of these two characters finally collide, their anger and disbelief registers strongly.  If America displays how immigrants are treated, “who would want to come here now.”

That’s a bleak picture for sure.  In this production, directed by Natalia Mariño, voice-over quotes by Donald Trump heighten the plausibility of the story.  When children’s pleas on an actual 2018 tape are played, it is hard to reconcile a nation which pompously crusades itself as a model of Christianity.  A question is posed very early in the play.  What makes history change?  Is it the academics, science or people?

Rodrigo Duran and Magdalena Morales are actors from Costa Rica and Guatemala, respectively.  Their solid and nicely controlled performances highlight their character’s intense convictions.  By the play’s end, they shine a blinding spotlight on an immoral future state which doesn’t seem impossible.

The play is performed in Spanish with English supertitles.  There are quite a few distractions in the production including video projections of the interview.  Overhead lights in the conference room changed positions and brightness but I was unable to determine why.  The ideas were enough tension to hold my interest.  When leaving the theater, I wondered how audiences throughout the world digested this material.

La Construcción del Muro (Building the Wall) was written in 2016 as dystopian fiction.  From the perspective of 2020, is it?  Your observations of current events will likely inform the gradient of your answer to that question.

This Costa Rican stage adaptation, co-produced by Teatro Espressivo and Teatro LATEA, is running until March 15, 2020.

www.teatrolatea.org

www.espressivo.cr

Suicide Forest (Ma-Yi Theater Company)

Those theatergoers who dare to venture into the ominous sounding Suicide Forest will encounter an experience both surreal and deeply grounded.  The title refers to Aokigahara, or Sea of Trees, located at the base of Mount Fuji.  In Japanese mythology this forest has a reputation as a home to ghosts of the dead.  Playwright Haruna Lee paints an unflattering picture of society through a completely unpredictable story arc.

A painting of Mount Fuji in all of its majestic beauty hangs on the wall of Jian Jung’s astonishing cartoon-like set.  Before the play gets underway, a ghost named Mad Mad (Aoi Lee) is walking around.  Searching?  Collecting?  In Lee’s play, vignettes are far from literal.  The two main characters of this play are Asuza, portrayed by the playwright, and Salaryman (an excellent Eddy Toru Ohno).  Asuza is a sixteen year old schoolgirl.  Salaryman is a much older white collar working man in his sixties.

Salaryman discusses a myriad of topics with a unnamed “Friend” (Keizo Kaji).  Men are carnivores and meat lovers.  Suicide is a coward’s way.  These men are victims of changing cultural mores particularly as they concern females.  Friend asks, “What’s up with women these days?”  Salaryman notes that you cannot even ask that question anymore without being fired.  These guys don’t want to become part of the new generation of herbivore men.

An Office Lady (Yuki Kawahisa) lets Salaryman know there are very young girls here to see him.  They have come for an interview.  Reality turns to fantasy and perhaps to dreams and nightmares.  Office Lady flirts aggressively with the older man.  Is she young enough for him?  This bizarre encounter winds up with her blunt question, “What are you thinking of in that disgusting, perverted little brain of yours?”

Sexual development and the objectification of women is front and center in Suicide Forest.  This topic does not travel down a safe road here.  The disturbing view into men and their thoughts add an uneasy but effective revulsion to these disjointed scenes.  Are women simply wired to exchange sex for material things?  Where is this play going?

In a humorous nod to Japanese game shows you may have seen on television, Salaryman will be the unwitting participant in a very public humiliation.  That section seems to flesh out the man’s unhappiness as a life long submissive member of the corporate emasculating machine.  Japanese belief systems are definitely on shaky ground.

Haruna Lee’s play takes many turns (some of them hairpin) and I will not spoil the intensely personal and vividly realized moments.  As an artist, Lee is trying to comprehend what it means to be 50% Japanese.  Sometimes 33% seems right.  Other times as high as 70%.  “I am also, usually, a high percentage of American too.”

There is one scene in this unique play in which goats are climbing a mountain.  That part felt overly long to sit through.  Most of the staging by Director Aya Ogawa cleverly embraces the fantastical sweep of the storytelling while allowing the societal observations and personal growth elements to shine.

Suicide Forest is not a play for those who have to traverse a linear path.  If you are willing to be led into a dark, unknowable sea of trees, surprises – both welcome and unwelcome – will expose themselves.  The effect is like emigrating to a foreign country.  Reconciling drastically different cultures while uncomfortably finding your own place within them.  This is meaty, risky and altogether idiosyncratic theater worth exploring and contemplating afterward.

Ma-Yi Theater Company’s encore presentation of Suicide Forest at the A.R.T./New York Theatre is running through March 15, 2020.  This play was originally performed at the Bushwick Starr in 2019.

www.ma-yitheatre.org

www.art-newyork.org

On How To Be a Monster (The Tank)

Tom Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities came to mind while watching On How To Be A Monster.  His 1987 bestselling novel satirized late twentieth century New York society.  He skewered the men as self-defined “Masters of the Universe” and their wives as “Social X-rays.”  Maria-Luiza Müller’s play similarly uses sarcasm to expose the vapidity of another generation of mentally vacant couples.

A television host is “feeling F-A-N-T-A-S-T-I-C, let me tell you!”  He spells words for emphasis.  As winningly portrayed by Adam Fisher, he embodies the Ryan Seacrest brand and smiles profusely.  His energy level implores that there is “no reason to be sad today.”  His IQ level, however, is questionable.  Perhaps that is why he is a perfect choice to host a television show with no depth or importance.  This play is definitely commenting on our viewing habits.

This particular program is “devoted to improving the society.”  The host lists a few social issues the audience should know about:  global warming, Planned Parenthood and starvation in Africa.  After that perfunctory nod to important things, the host then describes the game show to be played.

Four couples will compete to be selected as the Best Couple.  He reminds us that “the best couple is the happiest couple.”  There are three judging categories:  costumes, questions and “special skills or sad story.”  Both in studio and the television audiences are told their opinion is important.  Vote for your favorites.  Vote, vote, vote.

The first couple to compete is Don and Tara.  “They are a happy couple who love to walk in the park, watch TV and make French fries.”  The host then asks, “Is that correct?”  They say yes and, without a touch of irony, the host exclaims, “Amazing!”

Another couple responds to this question:  “what are your thoughts on starvation in Africa?”  The man responds that he “wants to adopt all the kids who are starving!”  Quickly the host moves to the next judging category.  Ms. Müller is clearly lambasting the one dimensional surface level bubble heads permeating the television airwaves.  Since there are four couples and only three issues, the final question provides the biggest laugh of the play.

The competing couples sit around a table sipping drinks and chit chatting.  They are modern day social x-rays, younger than Mr. Wolfe’s but no less insufferable.  When someone makes a comment that might be even remotely serious, they all laugh.  The satire is present but can still be enhanced.  The script calls for many pauses and Director Frederica Borlenghi stages the show that way.  The flattened cadence unfavorably compares with the hyperactivity of the game show section.  These couples could certainly be written as even more ridiculous caricatures.

A monster is also a character, appearing here and there.  Who or what is the monster and what does it represent?  There is a mystery within this play which dismantles the pretenses so carefully maintained by these cellophane stereotypes.  The end of the play provides an answer to the monster question.  Or does it?

Maria-Luiza Müller seems to see monsters in various guises.  Her observations are keen.  The ending of this play is memorable and effective.  Pacing and acerbic bite can still be further developed.

On How To Be a Monster is not a primer which provides a road map.  Our society’s contemptible self-absorption is certainly a big target here as is our ability to turn a blind eye.  Important issues loom large and continue to be ignored.  It makes you want to scream.

The Tank is a non-profit presenter and producer serving 2,500 artists in 1,000 productions annually on their two stages.

www.thetanknyc.org

Dana H. (Vineyard Theatre)

Ever since I saw The Christians in 2015, I have made sure to see every Lucas Hnath play since then.  The variety of subject matter and structural surprises never disappoint.  They are both thoughtful and thought-provoking.  He is pushing plays into new territories and challenging his audiences to sit back, listen, think and engage.  Directed by his long-time collaborator Les Waters, Dana H. is something new, bold, curiously calm and unforgettably harrowing.

When Mr. Hnath was attending New York University in 1998, his mother was kidnapped.  He learned about this trauma years later.  His mother apparently believed her ordeal might make for good subject matter.  He brought Steve Cosson into the idea.  Mr. Cosson is the Artistic Director of The Civilians, a troupe that specializes in investigative theater and the utilization of field research.

Dana H. is adapted from a series of taped interviews between Mr. Cosson and Dana, his mother.  Rather than develop a traditional multi-character (and potentially unwatchable) drama, Mr. Hnath brought his mother’s voice to the stage.  The entire play is largely Deidre O’Connell sitting in a chair and lip syncing to the taped interviews.  Riveting is an understatement.  You could hear a pin drop in the house.

The play is organized in three parts:  A Patient Named Jim, The Next Five Months and The Bridge.  Dana had a career as a chaplain in a hospice.  She saw the moment of death in her patients three to four times per week.  For twenty years.  She meets a patient named Jim who is recovering from a horrific suicide attempt.

Jim is a member of the Aryan Brotherhood and has the tattoos to prove it.  Dana wryly remarks that she understood his attraction to satanism.  “When I was young, I played around with that.”  Right from the beginning, details are mysterious.  Is she being witty?  Is she embellishing the story?  The words are from one person’s memory of a hugely traumatic event.  Is she a reliable narrator?  That’s for the listener to determine.

Mr. Hnath takes these interview tapes and rearranges them into snippets which suit his dramatic intentions.  The tape edits are the entire narrative.  We hear the beeps when storytelling is spliced together.  The interviewer is heard but not a character in the play.  Dana sits alone and takes us through her ordeal.

Her recollection is filled with mental and physical abuse.  Police are unhelpful, either scared of the Brotherhood or chummy with it.  Are those comments real or are they are product of her mental state during an extensive incarceration with a madman.  When the two go to a gun pawnshop, Jim admits that he is a felon and cannot buy the gun.  Instead he says, “she’ll buy it.”  Mr. Hnath’s incisive details frequently comment on larger societal themes without preaching.

Ms. O’Connell’s mind-blowing performance is not to be missed by anyone who relishes perfection in character acting.  The lip syncing is technically phenomenal.  Even recorded sounds are captured in her physical movements.  The performance is essentially a solo pantomime.  All eyes are on Dana.  The depth of her emotions expressively register on her face.  We are pulled inside her brain.  The tale is frightening which makes her inevitable survival a relief.

The biggest mystery not explored in this play concerns Lucas the son.  Where was he as all of this activity happened over a very extended period of time?  I assume he knew of his parent’s separation.  That enabled Jim to weave his way in Dana’s life before tormenting her in classic sociopath fashion.  Mr. Hnath does not attempt to wrap up that question.  Nor does he even suggest whether he believes the details are completely accurate or influenced by PTSD.  In letting Dana speak for herself, his absorption in his mother’s memories become ours as well.

Performances of Dana H. have been extended at the Vineyard Theatre until April 11, 2020.

www.vineyardtheatre.org

www.thecivilians.org